Contact
Johan.Toren@slu.se, Division of Planning, +46 (0)18 672219
Policy, rules and guidelines for first-cycle and second-cycle education at SLU.
Click on the heading you want to read more about, this will take you to the corresponding chapter further down the page. At the bottom of the page, there are attachments and footnotes.
The education manual is also available as a pdf. The most important changes are described in the decision document. Where there are official translations of laws, these are cited, in other cases, the translation of legal texts is SLU's own.
1.1 Purpose of the handbook, target group and demarcation
1.2 Content and outline
1.3 Abbreviations and recurring concepts
1.4 Changes to the previous version
2.1 Legal conditions
2.2 Financial conditions
2.3 Organisational conditions
2.4 Academic year and semester dates
2.5 Subject, main field of study, disciplinary domain
3.1 Starting points
3.2 Teaching environments
3.3 Equal opportunities
3.4 Study and career guidance
3.5 Study with a disability
3.6 Student copyright
3.7 Student insurance
3.8 Student costs and reimbursements
3.9 Tuition fees
3.10 Tuition fee refunds
3.11 Student debt conditions
3.12 Scholarships
3.13 Approved leave from studies and non-completion
3.14 Student influence
3.15 Complaint procedures
3.16 Appeal a decision
4.1 Starting points
4.2 Educational development
4.3 University teacher with merit-based salary increment (“Excellent teacher”)
4.4 Degree-awarding powers at department level
4.5 Examiner
4.6 Competence requirements for examiners
4.7 Change of examiner
4.8 Teacher copyright
4.9 Staff liability issues
5.1 Starting points
5.2 Course evaluations
5.3 Programme evaluations
5.4. Student welfare follow-up
5.5 Dialogues on quality
6.1 Starting points
6.2 Course syllabus
6.3 Grading system
6.4 Course instances
6.5 Termination of a course
6.6 Course modules
6.7 Termination of a course
7.1 Early course information
7.2 Course instance application
7.3 Course instance admission
7.4 Start of a course
7.5 Course instance registration
7.6 Non-completion of a course
8.1 Examinations (tests) and grading
8.2 Examination times, locations and registration
8.3 Rules for written examinations
8.4 Other types of examination (tests)
8.5 Compulsory steps
8.6 Special reasons
8.7 Grading decisions
8.8 Reporting results and documentation
8.9 Feedback and handing back written examinations
8.10 Alternative examination session
8.11 Renewed examination (retake session)
8.12 Renewed examination (retake session) limitations
9.1 Utgångspunkter
9.2 Kursplan
9.3 Arbetsplan
9.4 Implementation organisation
10.1 Cheating and plagiarism
10.2 Inform and prevent
10.3 Discover and intervene
10.4 Disciplinary measures
11.1 Degree programme objectives and requirements at SLU
11.2 Dimension degree programmes
11.3 Propose a new degree programme
11.4 Principles for naming a degree programme
11.5 Joint programmes and degrees
11.6 Phase out a degree programme
12.1 Programme syllabus
12.2 Programme instance
12.3 Temporary freeze on admissions
13.1 Programme application (programme instance)
13.2 Programme admission (programme instance)
13.3 Programme registration (programme instance)
13.4 Admission to latter parts of programmes
13.5 Approved leave from studies and non-completion of a programme
13.6 Changes to the range of courses offered within a programme
13.7 Programme director of studies
15.1 External collaboration
15.2 External collaboration purpose and objectives
15.3 Education planning – external collaboration
15.4 External collaboration and student progression
15.5 External collaboration for good working life connections (teachers)
15.6 Follow-up
16.1 Starting points
16.2 Undergraduate procedures
Annex 2: Annual cycle for course and programme planning
Annex 5: Joint course evaluation questions (Evald)
Annex 6: Joint course evaluation questions (Evald) for independent projects (degree projects)
Annex 8: Depublication process for pdf files already published in Epsilon
Annex 9: Changing a pdf file already published in Epsilon
1.1 Purpose of the handbook, target group and demarcation
1.2 Content and outline
1.3 Abbreviations and recurring concepts
1.4 Changes to the previous version
The general purpose of the handbook is to clarify the rights and obligations of students, teachers and other staff at SLU.
The handbook covers most issues concerning first-cycle and second-cycle education at SLU. Certain parts of SLU education is governed elsewhere, but described here. In other parts, the handbook acts as the governing document for SLU.
In addition, the handbook provides the reader with instructions and references.
However, please remember that the handbook does not apply to
The chapters correspond to various aspects of SLU education, and each chapter’s subsections generally include a number of recurring subheadings:
Important concepts
Terms and concepts which may need to be defined and explained.
Policy
SLU’s intention and purpose. Sometimes, other documents describing SLU objectives and strategies are referenced.
National regulations
Regulations that govern SLU operations and which apply to both students and employees. Statutes decided by the Riksdag and government (e.g. acts) take precedence over SLU’s internal rules. Therefore, these statutes are frequently referenced, both through direct quotes and comprehensive explanations of the legislative texts. If a statute is changed, it applies even if SLU’s internal documents have not been updated. If necessary, go to the source to check the latest version.
SLU rules
The handbook constitutes a governing document for internal rules concerning first-cycle and second-cycle education at SLU. In certain cases, these rules are decided in another document, which will then be referenced. If necessary, go to the source to check the latest version. At SLU, we sometimes use the term “guidelines” to mean the same as “rules”.
Who is responsible for what?
Division of responsibility for the work described in the section. SLU’s delegations of authority take precedence over the handbook in regard to delegated powers and division of responsibility between various bodies and functionaries. If a delegation of authority is changed, it applies even if SLU’s internal documents have not been updated. If necessary, go to the source to check the latest version. In addition to the university- and faculty-wide delegations of authority, the departments normally have internal divisions of responsibility for issues related to education.
Instructions
Information on how to carry out a task, step or measure. SLU normally follows recommendations from SUHF (the Association of Swedish Higher Education Institutions). However, these recommendations do not govern our operations, but must be included in an SLU decision in order to apply.
Links
Where applicable, we recommend additional information and in-depth reading in the form of links. These links often go to the SLU web.
The headings above cannot be found in every subsection, which might include other headings specific to a certain section. But this is the general structure.
The information in the handbook normally applies, but exceptions may be allowed if necessary. Exceptions are decided by the same authority that decided on the original regulation, but they can also be decided by another authority, mostly if there are circumstances beyond SLU’s control.
Laws and other statutes (only in Swedish)
Rules for doctoral education
Rules for contract education (only in Swedish)
Tillbaka till kapitlets början
Abbreviations and concepts that occur in the handbook and in other contexts related to education at SLU:
Entry requirements – prior knowledge and other requirements necessary for a student to be eligible for a certain programme or course.
Canvas* – a learning platform that will be introduced at SLU during 2018/19 (also see Fronter).
Dean – the head of an SLU faculty.
Delegation of authority – see section 2.3 Organisational conditions.
Exemption – individual exceptions to rules that generally apply.
Evald* – SLU’s system for electronic course evaluations at first-cycle and second-cycle level.
Faculty – umbrella term for organisational divisions led by a faculty board/dean. The faculties are responsible for the departments.
Faculty office – part of the university administration at SLU which supports and provides service for each faculty.
Faculty board – the highest decision-making body within a faculty.
Non-programme student – student who is not studying a programme.
Fronter* – a learning platform aimed to inform and communicate with the student during a specific course (also see Canvas).
Department – education, research and environmental monitoring and assessment are carried out at a number of departments (or equivalent). The head of department is responsible for operations. Every department belongs to at least one faculty.
KronoX* – system for booking rooms such as lecture halls, computer rooms and group rooms.
Ladok* – a national system for study documentation that includes registration, examination results and other compulsory information.
Equivalence assessment – a person who does not meet formal entry requirements may have other qualifications deemed to correspond to the listed requirements.
Moveon* – used for agreements, applications and administration concerning student exchange (at first- and second-cycle level) and teacher mobility.
NyA* – a national admissions system used for course and programme admissions at both first- and second-cycle level.
Head of department – head of an SLU department. The head of department is tasked and authorised by both the vice-chancellor and faculty board/dean.
Programme board (PN) – part of SLU’s educational organisation. See section 2.3 Organisational conditions and the SLU web: Educational organisation.
Degree programme student – student admitted to or who has begun studying a degree programme.
Programme director of studies (PSR) – part of SLU’s educational organisation. See section 13.7 Programme director of studies and the SLU web: Programme directors of studies.
Slukurs* – SLU’s database for documenting programmes, courses and course instances, both at first-, second-, third-cycle or preparatory level.
Slunik and course pages* – course information where all first- and second-cycle courses have their own section. Slunik information is displayed on the course page, the student or external web. Doctoral courses may also provide information through Slunik.
Student web* – the students’ internal web where they can find information or support regarding their studies.
Director of studies – the handbook includes the term department director of studies (or equivalent) (see section 2.3 Organisational conditions) to avoid confusion with programme director of studies (see section 13.7 Programme director of studies).
SUHF – the Association of Swedish Higher Education Institutions.
UHR – the Swedish Council for Higher Education is a public authority nationally tasked with promoting higher education. Among other things, UHR is responsible for admission and study information – studera.nu for information on higher education and antagning.se for course and programme applications.
UKÄ – the Swedish Higher Education Authority is a public authority which, among other things, reviews the quality of higher education and research and which monitors universities and higher education institutions regarding compliance with laws and regulations.
Division of Educational Affairs – part of the university administration at SLU which supports and provides service for students and teachers. See the SLU web: Division of Educational Affairs.
Exchange student – student who studies through an exchange programme. An incoming exchange student comes to SLU to carry out their exchange studies (at first- or second-cycle level) and counts as a degree programme student. Incoming students have access to programme courses during their exchange period. An outgoing exchange student is an SLU student who travels abroad to carry out their exchange studies in another country.
Urkund* – a plagiarism tracking system that SLU teachers have access to where all types of examination assignments and written assignments are checked against a large number of sources to discover possible plagiarism.
Board of Education (UN) – part of SLU’s educational organisation (https://internt.slu.se/en/support-services/education/education-at-bachelors-and-masters-level/local-statutes-and-organization/educational-bodies/21/).
Conditions – a decision made with certain conditions only applies if the listed conditions are met.
Annual cycle – SLU applies joint time frames for planning and decisions on the offered course and programmes. See 2: Annual cycle for course and programme planning (only in Swedish).
*) Specific authorisation is required to use our educational support systems. Authorisation is given by the Division of Educational Affairs.
The first version of the education planning and administration handbook was approved in a decision by the chair of the Board of Education on 18 June 2018 (SLU ID: SLU.ua.2018.1.1.1-2343) before the academic year 2018/19. The decision states which previous decisions and governing documents were repealed and which changes were made when the handbook entered into force.
The following sections have been added or revised during 2019:
In addition, the following clarifications have been made:
Some references have been corrected and a number of links (equivalent) have been supplemented in the 2019 version of the education planning and administration handbook. This mostly concerns various forms that were missing from the previous version.
To the start of the chapter
To the start of the page
2.1 Legal conditions
2.2 Financial conditions
2.3 Organisational conditions
2.4 Academic year and semester dates
2.5 Subject, main field of study, disciplinary domain
SLU is a public authority and operations are regulated by legislation and ordinances decided at national level. Below is a link to a list of some of the acts and ordinances most important to SLU.
“As the accountable authority, the Government shall establish higher education institutions for the provision of courses and study programmes based on scholarship or artistic practice and on proven experience [...]”.[1]
Courses and study programmes shall be provided at:[2]
Laws and other statutes (only in Swedish)
The SLU Board has decided on principles regarding the allocation of direct government funding by the board to the faculties for courses and programmes at first- and second-cycle level.[3] To sum up, the model is based on the following basic principles:
Categories at this level:
Settlement is based on the principle that a programme group gets paid for what it actually produces. This is regulated at the end of the year in the form of a settlement or increase of the actual number of FTEs and APEs during the year in question.[1]
The example below shows how the programme groups are paid in 2018 based on the following calculation:
The APE forecast is set to the APEs during the last 12 months. However, in certain cases an estimate will be made for e.g. new programmes, programmes being developed or terminated.
Settlement occurs at programme group level and in relation to the results for the year in question. The following calculation is used:
If a programme group’s actual number of students (based on the outcome data) is fewer than the number of students they have been paid for, they will have to pay back funds corresponding to the difference. A programme group with an actual number of students larger than the number they were paid for will be given funding to cover the difference, if possible.
Since study administrative costs have already been paid for the FTE assignment, an amount corresponding to these costs will be excepted from the settlement amount.
Funding of certain hared resources can be done using joint funds at university level. It mostly applies to infrastructure that is available to all SLU students. In this case, it primarily means strategic development funds and reimbursement for teaching premises in cases where these are not paid for using user charges.
Component |
Calculating reimbursement for courses |
Basic reimbursement |
Number of credits * X SEK.[6] |
Performance |
The number of full-time equivalents (FTEs) * variable reimbursement in accordance with the course’s resource-based categorisation described below. The level is decided by the programme board. |
Incentive payments |
Supplements, or, in certain cases, deductions, as described below. |
Reimbursement category |
Qualitative description for resource-based categorisation of courses. The programme board decides the amount of reimbursement levels as well as the reimbursement for each level.[7] |
1 |
Typical courses can be described as “self-study courses” with a minimal amount of exercises led by teachers. Most teaching is done in front of a “whole class”. The course includes general skills training. |
2 |
Typical courses can be described as “seminar courses” with a relatively high number of lectures** and a moderate amount of exercises led by teachers*. Most teaching is done in front of a combination of a “whole class” and relatively large groups. As stated in the course syllabus, the course includes general skills |
3 |
Typical courses can be described as courses combining theory and application through lectures** and an average amount of exercises led by teachers*. Study visits and field exercises may also be included. Most teaching is done in front of a combination of a “whole class” and various exercise groups. As stated in the |
4 |
Typical courses can be described as “lab courses” with a relatively high amount of exercises led by teachers*. Study visits and field exercises may also be included. Most teaching is done in front of lab groups, but lectures** and other “whole class” or large group activities are also included. As stated in the course syllabus, |
5 |
Typical courses can be described as intensive with a very substantial amount of exercises led by teachers*, e.g. “studio courses”. Field exercises and study visits may also be included. Most teaching is done in front of small groups, but lectures** and other “whole class” or large group activities are also included. As stated in the course syllabus, general skills training is the biggest part of the course, and is important for the students’ future professional life. |
6 |
Typical courses can be described as intensive with the highest number of exercises led by teachers. Field exercises and study visits may also be included. Most teaching is done in front of very small groups, but large group activities are also included. As stated in the course syllabus, general skills training is the biggest part of the course, and is important for the students’ future professional life. |
7 |
The programme board proportions resource allocation for specific courses not included in the replacement categories listed above. Exceptions must be reported to the Board of Education and be justified in the same manner as the programme boards do. This normally includes so-called clinic rotation courses within the Veterinary Medicine programme. |
* Exercise time or “module activity” are used as umbrella terms for teaching dependent on the number of students taking a course, i.e. the number of groups normally increase if the number of students increases. Here, the concepts are used to include a number of various forms of teaching with a high degree of student-teacher interactivity. “Module activities” include exercises, seminars, excursions, field exercises, laboratory sessions, workshops, design studios and clinical training.
** Lectures or “whole course activity” are used as umbrella terms for teaching not dependent on the number of students taking a course. Lectures, lessons and other equivalents are considered whole course activities.
Distance learning courses are included in the joint allocation model, even if the category descriptions above have their starting point in campus-based courses.
Incentive payment objectives and other specific supplements or deductions:
Continual evaluation and development regarding single courses must be covered by regular course reimbursement given to the department. They do not justify incentive payments.
Funding of certain specific resources can be done using joint funds at faculty level. This mostly applies to relatively fixed infrastructure that will be used short- or mid-term by several degree programmes/student groups, but not by all SLU students. In
certain cases, allocation must be shared by two or several programme boards. This mostly concerns reimbursement for programme directors of studies, exercise laboratories, drafting rooms, clinical training centres and other specially designed teaching premises, cultivation facilities, field course operations, stables, animal hospitals.
A faculty’s resource allocation includes distributing tasks and funds between departments that run courses jointly.[8]
The department decides how to use the funds allocated to them within the framework stated in the budget and course syllabus. Even if reimbursement is calculated per course, each department must decide how to use its resources in order to complete their assignment in the best way. However, when several departments are jointly responsible for a course, the possibility to redistribute resources is limited to the specific funds allocated to each department.
The course syllabus objectives govern how a course or programme is to be run at general level. The resource allocation model should not hinder desirable development dynamics, but provide incentives to reconsider how to carry out and implement new types of teaching. Most importantly, the course coordinator designs the schedule and therefore decides how to adjust different types of teaching, group sizes, exercise intensity, etc.
The head of department or the person(s) given responsibility by the head of department decides on redistribution between and within single courses.
When allocating duties within the department, the head of department must consider the working hour agreement for teachers, etc. Link to current agreement (only in Swedish)
The vice-chancellor decides on basic reimbursement for university- and faculty-wide objectives (university- and faculty-wide costs) when the SLU Board decides on the allocation of funds. Reimbursement for university-wide study administration and study infrastructure, as well as the course or programme’s part of the library, is based on the predicted number of full-time equivalents and is paid from by the course and programme funds at department level. The course or programme’s share of reimbursement for other university- and faculty-wide objectives, such as staff and financial administration, as well as university and faculty management, is based on a percentage of staff salaries added as a supplement.
The course or programme share of reimbursement for department-wide objectives is decided at department level and based on a percentage of staff salaries added as a supplement.
SLU’s educational organisation is schematically described in Annex 1: SLU's educational organisation.
Dean – the head of an SLU faculty.
Delegation of authority – states the responsibilities and powers of bodies and decision-makers within the university. It also lists the composition of deciding and advisory bodies as well as their mandate periods. The departments normally have an internal division of responsibility for education issues, among other things. Student influence is described in section 3.14 Student influence.
Faculty – an umbrella term for an organisational unit led by a faculty board/dean at SLU. The faculties are responsible for the departments.
Department – university education, research and environmental monitoring and assessment are carried out at a number of departments (or equivalent). Each department belongs to at least one faculty.
Head of department – head of an SLU department.
Programme board (PN) – part of SLU’s educational organisation. See Annex 1: SLU's educational organisation.
Programme director of studies (PSR) – part of SLU’s educational organisation. See Annex 1: SLU's educational organisation.
Director of studies – normally, a department has one (or several) employees with a coordinating responsibility for departmental education at first-cycle and second-cycle level. These persons are often called director of studies, department director of studies, person responsible for undergraduate studies, deputy head of department responsible for education or equivalent. The handbook includes the term department director of studies (or equivalent) to avoid confusion with programme director of studies (see section 13.7 Programme director of studies).
University administration – supports and provides service for the university’s education, research and environmental monitoring and assessment (see the delegation of authority for the university administration).
Board of Education (UN) – part of SLU’s educational organisation. See Annex 1: SLU's educational organisation.
Annual cycle – SLU applies joint time frames for planning and decisions on the offered course and programmes. See Annex 2: Annual cycle for course and programme planning.
The SLU Board and vice-chancellor decide on the general organisation and division of responsibility within the university. Each faculty decides on their internal division of responsibility. The departments normally have an internal division of responsibility for education issues, among other things. The Board of Education decides on the joint annual cycle for course and programme planning.
The academic year is divided into an autumn, spring and summer semester. The academic year begins on the first day of the autumn semester and is concluded on the last day before the next autumn semester begins.
Monday–Friday count as weekdays, excluding holidays.
“The extent of a course or study programme shall be denoted by credits, with full-time study during a normal academic year of 40 weeks corresponding to 60 credits.”[9]
SLU follows SUHF’s recommendation on how to divide semesters.
Semester dates including period divisions (15 credits) must be published on the SLU web at least one academic year in advance. Teaching-free days and site-specific semester information such as course and programme information and joint retake dates must be listed on the SLU web in good time before scheduling of the coming semester’s courses is done.
Normally, there is no scheduled teaching Wednesday afternoons. Exceptions may be granted by the programme board in question.
The following semester dates apply at SLU:
The Division of Educational Affairs publishes semester dates, including period divisions, on the SLU web.
Site-specific information is decided by the programme board(s) responsible for education at the site in question.
Education at first-cycle and second-cycle level is classified into subjects. Some subjects are main fields of study at SLU. Within these, SLU can offer progressive specialisation which enables the students to also be awarded general qualifications.
Every subject/main field of study is included in a disciplinary domain.
SLU’s subjects, main fields of study and disciplinary domains are listed in Annex 3: First cycle and second cycle subjects at SLU. There are also subject descriptions for the main fields of study. They are listed in an annex to Lokal examensordning – regler för examina på grundnivå och avancerad nivå vid SLU (SLU’s examination procedures for first cycle and second cycle level – only in Swedish).
A subject/main field of study can be broad and focus on synthesis or narrow and involve specialisation. This division is not always the same at first-, second- or third-cycle level.
The main fields of study can be viewed as strategic standpoints and should also be viewed in relation to SLU’s mission statement, role and profile. Our main fields of study are important for student recruitment since they contribute to communicating course and programme content and their distinctive character. They also govern possible qualifications.
Course content decides subject classification. See section 6.2 Course syllabus.
When proposing a new subject at SLU which will not act as a main field of study, the following must be specified:
When proposing a new main field of study at SLU, the following must be specified:
New main field of study proposals must consider opinions from all programme boards and faculty boards.
When proposing to terminate a main field of study at SLU, the following must be specified:
Qualification specialisation
A qualification specialisation can be used for the following reasons:
The following must be specified in new SLU specialisation proposals:
Activity |
Main field of study |
Proposal |
Department, |
Approve/reject |
Programme board, faculty board and Board of Education |
Decision to set up |
The SLU Board |
Subject |
The Board of Education |
Annex 2: Annual cycle for course and programme planning lists, among other things, joint timeframes for planning and decisions on the range of courses and programmes offered. Any changes to subjects/main fields of study must made in good time to enable adjustments to e.g. course and programme syllabuses.
The following range of courses should be available, or be possible, to justify a new main field of study at first-cycle level:
The following range of courses should be available, or be possible, to justify a new main field of study at second-cycle level:
Terms relating to course level and specialisation within a main field of study are listed in an annex to Lokal examensordning – regler för examina på grundnivå och avancerad nivå vid SLU (SLU’s examination procedures for first cycle and second cycle level – only in Swedish).
Lokal examensordning – regler för examina på grundnivå och avancerad nivå vid SLU
3.1 Starting points
3.2 Teaching environments
3.3 Equal opportunities
3.4 Study and career guidance
3.5 Study with a disability
3.6 Student copyright
3.7 Student insurance
3.8 Student costs and reimbursements
3.9 Tuition fees
3.10 Tuition fee refunds
3.11 Student debt conditions
3.12 Scholarships
3.13 Approved leave from studies and non-completion
3.14 Student influence
3.15 Complaint procedures
3.16 Appeal a decision
“In this ordinance ‘student’ refers to those who have been admitted to and pursue higher education studies…”[12]
A teaching environment is a physical or virtual place for learning. It can be indoors, outdoors or online.
Formal (physical) teaching environments consist of auditoriums, classrooms, laboratories and group rooms (etc.). All are bookable for teacher-led learning.
Informal (physical) learning environments are public spaces (often in connection to formal teaching environments) used by students for individual work or group assignments.
Learning management systems are a large part of the virtual learning environment.
SLU’s learning environments should
SLU management of teaching environments should be characterised by the following:
Teaching, tests or other activities relating to education may not be disturbed.
Normally, students may not have children or pets with them in connection with educational activities. The teacher (for individual classes) or the course coordinator (for an entire course) determines what applies for each case.
Special regulations, and (occasional) safety ordinances, apply for certain premises and activities relating to education, e.g. laboratories, libraries, stables, clinics, excursions, study visits and examinations. See chapter 8. Examination (tests) and compulsory steps.
The Division of Educational Affairs, Division of Facility Management and Division of IT, which work within university administration, coordinate teaching environment issues.
Harassment constitutes conduct that violates a person’s dignity and is associated with one of the seven grounds of discrimination. It may take the form of comments, gestures or freezing someone out. The victim of harassment decides what they consider harassing.
Harassment can also be of a sexual nature. It is then called sexual harassment. In addition to comments and words, it can take the form of groping or intrusive looks. Unwelcome compliments, invitations and innuendos also count as sexual harassment.
Discrimination is when someone is treated unfairly or violated. In order to be constituted as discrimination, unfair treatment or violation should be connected to the seven grounds of discrimination (see below).
Equal opportunities work at SLU should result in equal opportunities and equal rights for staff and students in their work and studies respectively. This work is specified and documented in annual action plans at university-wide level and faculty level.
SLU’s equal opportunities work for all employees and students is based on the Discrimination Act.[14] The purpose of this act is to combat discrimination and harassment and in other ways promote equal rights and opportunities regardless of
An education provider may not discriminate against any child, pupil or student participating in or applying for activities.[15]
Equal opportunities work also includes measures for increased accessibility.
The university must use active measures to counteract discrimination and promote equal rights and opportunities for students and employees. SLU has an equal opportunities organisation to support this work. The university is also obligated to investigate and take measures against harassment.
Both staff and students at SLU must play their part in achieving a healthy work and study environment from an equal opportunities perspective.
A student who has been the victim of sexual harassment or other forms of harassment can receive support from various persons at the university. On the SLU web, there is more information on where to turn as well as advice for students who have been victims of harassment. There are also guidelines for how suspicions of harassment are taken care of at SLU.
Harassment and equal treatment
Guidelines for suspected student harassment in accordance with the Discrimination Act
Study and career guidance at SLU contributes to
”Students shall be provided with study and career guidance. Higher education institutions shall ensure that those intending to begin a course or study programme have access to the information about it that is required.”[16]
”The higher education institution shall also be responsible for other student welfare activities to support students in their studies or facilitate their transition to the labour market as well as otherwise providing students with a sound environment in which to study[17]
Among other things, secrecy applies to higher education institutions’ activities relating to “information connected to a psychological examination
or treatment, and for information regarding an individual’s personal
relationships with a psychologist, counsellor or study and career guidance,
unless it is clear that the information can be deleted without harming the
individual or their next of kin”.[18]
All guidance functions at SLU must maintain secrecy regarding the individual student’s personal conditions.
Students are always responsible to make their own decisions. Therefore, guidance means providing them with enough information and support to enable them to take a personal standpoint.
Study and career guidance for SLU students is provided by study counsellors and programme directors of studies.
Our general study counsellors are impartial and do not have any form of teacher role. The study counsellors’ operational model supports students coming to SLU, their actual studies and the transition from studying to working. They use a joint discussion model, which contributes to equal, high-quality guidance for the student.
Primary target groups:
Study guidance should concern
Study counsellors are competent at guiding students.
Programme directors of studies primarily provide subject- and programme-specific information and guidance, and reference other student services at the university. Programme directors of studies must follow secrecy rules when counselling students.
Their main target group is students studying the programme they are responsible for.
Study guidance should concern
Programme directors of studies focus on the programme and subject in question.
Contact information for the programme directors of studies can be found at the respective programme pages on the student web.
Permanent disabilities that can limit studies include the following:
A broken arm, etc. is not considered a lasting disability.
The same intended learning outcomes apply to all students, regardless of any disability. By offering learning support and adjusting study situations, SLU tries to create the same opportunities to enable all students to complete their studies. The aim of learning support is to help the student overcome study obstacles caused by permanent disabilities. However, learning support can never replace the personal responsibility of the student.
The course and programme provider must follow the Discrimination Act, which aims to counteract discrimination and in other ways promote equal rights and opportunities regardless of, among other things, disabilities.
Students with a permanent (not temporary) disability which limit their studies are allowed learning support. This support should be individually designed based on the student’s disability and study situation.
The student is always personally responsible for their studies and study results.
Students must apply for special learning support on the SLU web. They must provide a certificate that confirms that they have a disability. Processing time can vary over the year, but may take up to three weeks.
The student decides who they want to inform about their disability. However, a course coordinator needs to be told about any special needs before the course starts.
Students who have been granted special learning support and who wish to use their right to alternative exam arrangements must contact the course coordinator or course administration in good time, preferably when the course starts, but at least fifteen (15) weekdays before the exam takes place. They must always submit their recommendation for alternative arrangements.
Contact information for coordinators can be found on the SLU web. There are also instructions for learning support applications, information on what support is available as well as what applies for alternative exam arrangements.
Intellectual property rights involve rights that have been or can be protected as intellectual property in accordance with current legislation, e.g. patents, copyright, trademark, design protection and plant variety rights.
According to SLU’s intellectual property rights policy, the starting point is that intellectual property rights created in relation to university education and research is given to the originator. Both students and employees at SLU can be originators (i.e. have copyright) of literary and artistic works. Everyone is treated equally in this sense. SLU has no right to any inventions or similar that are created in combination with student works, regardless of whether they are patentable or not.
Reproducing other people’s texts, tables, images and other illustrations can be a violation of copyright. This applies even if a quote is marked and the source is given.
For student work published at SLU, it is required that permission from the copyright holder is granted for the use of
Audio/video recordings or photography relating to teaching is only allowed if this is stated in the course syllabus, or following agreement with the teacher in question. This applies to all types of teaching, including excursions, study visits, etc. It is not allowed to publish or spread photos, film or audio relating to teaching through e.g. social media without the teacher’s approval. Students are also not allowed to publish or spread teaching material without the teacher’s permission.
Students with disabilities may receive learning support, which can include, for example, audio or video recordings relating to teaching. See section 3.5 Study with a disability. The recordings are only meant for personal use, and they too require the teacher’s permission.
Data that the student has compiled is, as a rule, not the object of copyrighted material. During ongoing studies, all collected data must always be available for review by the supervisor and examiner.
If the student chooses to write an independent project (degree project) within the framework of an ongoing research project, the project manager of the research project is responsible to store necessary collected data.
Moreover, the student is not generally obligated to submit their personal data to the department when the course has concluded.
The student owns the copyright to their independent project and equivalent. The supervisor’s participation does not lead to joint copyright.
However, information about the supervisor must be listed when publishing an independent project. See chapter 9. Independent project (degree project).. In the event that the results from the degree project is used for publication in another context, the later publication must either refer to the degree project or the student and supervisor must be listed as co-authors.
Intellectual property rights policy
VFU = clinical training.
The Legal, Financial and Administrative Services Agency is responsible for insurance at all public authorities. Public authorities are only allowed take out insurance with the Legal, Financial and Administrative Services Agency.
It is important that students have access to relevant insurance information.
Students at Swedish higher education institutions are insured through the Legal, Financial and Administrative Services Agency’s personal injury insurance for students. According to its’ regulations, insurance applies in Sweden when students are on university premises or travelling directly between their homes and university premises.
Insurance does not apply during their leisure time.
Complete insurance conditions can be found on the Legal, Financial and Administrative Services Agency’s web.
Förordning (1982:1077) om ersättning av allmänna medel för skador orsakade av studerande vid statliga högskoleenheter under praktik på icke- statliga arbetsplatser (ordinance for reimbursement of public funds for injuries caused by students from public higher education institutions during placement at non-governmental workplaces – only in Swedish) regulates personal injury or damage to property caused by students during VFU/placement. However, VFU/placement must be included in the course syllabus, and the student must be registered to the course in Ladok.
The student must be registered to a course in Ladok to be sure that they are covered by the Legal, Financial and Administrative Services Agency’s personal injury insurance for students. However, students do not need to re-register in Ladok to retake an examination, but they must register for the examination as usual.
Special rules apply for students who travel abroad for a course or degree project. Incoming students must also follow special rules – see below.
Any injuries to animals or equipment caused by a student during VFU/placement counts as damage to property.
SLU’s operational insurance covers SLU operations. It can include damages caused by a student working with the animal ambulance service or the University Animal Hospital. The course-coordinating department is responsible.
There are two ways to manage insurance for students who travel abroad through a course or programme:
This also applies if a department approves a student’s request to study abroad within the framework of a course, even if the course is not included in any exchange agreements within the Division of Educational Affairs.
Student insurance and notifications of damage
It is important to provide early and clear information to students regarding who pays for what. SLU must strive, as far as possible, to minimise students’ educational costs.
Students normally pay for their personal material. This also applies to students who do not pay tuition fees.
When travelling within a course or programme, public transport should, if possible, be prioritised.
In general, the following applies:
In general, the student must pay for travel costs within the site and its immediate area. Here, immediate area refers to an area that can be reached with local transport within a reasonable amount of time.
Students may be reimbursed for personal car expenses paid in connection with a study trip, excursion or equivalent. In those cases, SLU applies the Swedish Tax Office’s standard for tax-exempt car reimbursement per every ten kilometres. The responsible department decides if any reimbursement will be paid, and must provide this information before the trip.
If a course includes costs for study trips, this must be stated in the course information on the course page at least four weeks before the course starts.
For study trips outside the site area, the responsible department must reimburse the student with at least 50 per cent of the student’s costs for travel and accommodation. The student must normally pay for other costs.
If the department cannot pay at least 50 percent of the student’s costs for travel and accommodation, they must provide a cost-free alternative to the study trip.
If a course is expected to include great costs for the student (e.g. for international study trips), this must be stated in the course syllabus under additional information. If travel costs are lower (e.g. for domestic study trips) this must be stated in the course information on the course page at least four weeks before the course starts.
The student must normally pay for all additional costs for education that consists of, or includes, workplace-based placement or clinical training. However, SLU may reimburse the student for increased living expenses. The responsible programme board funds such reimbursements.
Students taking courses or programmes with required placements must be given clear information early on. Course or programme presentations must include such information prior to application.
In order to assess necessary protective equipment for students, the same working conditions that apply to employees also apply to students. Examples of protective equipment are protective eyewear, hearing protectors, breathing protectors, protective gloves and protective shoes. Protective coats (“lab coats”) can also be viewed as protective equipment in work with animal material, chemicals and microorganisms.
The car expenses and payment form can be found under 2. Payments. See Blanketter för ekonomihantering (only in Swedish).
Non-citizens or those who do not have residence permits in an EEA state or Switzerland (“third-country nationals”) must pay tuition fees for education at first-cycle and second-cycle level.[1]
Tuition fees must be based on the principle of full cost coverage of fee-funded activities.[2]
SLU follows the guidelines applied by the Swedish Agency for Higher Education Services’ (UHR) regarding the management of tuition fees, as well as the Association of Swedish Higher Education’s (SUHF) recommendations[3] within the field.
The student must pay their tuition fees before every semester starts. SLU decides on the exact payment time using SUHF recommendations. In order for the student to begin their studies, they must have paid their whole tuition fee to SLU beforehand.
The tuition fee includes the offer of accommodation, but not rent or other costs connected to admission to or studies at SLU. See section 3.8 Student costs and reimbursements.
In accordance with sections 8.5 Compulsory steps and 8.11 Renewed exam (retake session), students who have not completed their courses may do so at a later date without being charged extra tuition fees. Students may be re-registered to a course without having to pay another fee. This only applies if there are available places within the course. Re-registration is managed in the same way as for students funded through direct government funding.
The Division of Educational Affairs decides how much a student must pay for the coming semester.
Tuition fee levels are reviewed and updated (if necessary) every three years. The Division of Educational Affairs decides on the update of tuition fees to current reimbursement levels. The Board of Education decides on any updates of the central appropriation fee and study administrative fee.
In certain cases, a paid tuition fee can be refunded:
Circumstance |
Refund |
The student drops out before the course or programme begins. |
The prepaid tuition fee is refunded. |
The student applies for a deferment in paying their tuition fees before the course or programme begins. (A denied residence permit is not a reason for deferment.) |
If the application is |
The tuition fee has been prepaid and the student has begun their studies but drops out within the first three weeks. |
The prepaid tuition fee |
The student is denied to continue their studies by the Higher Education Expulsions Board or suspended by the disciplinary board. |
The prepaid tuition fee |
The student’s fee status changes, for example through citizenship. Exception: The student applied for citizenship or a residence permit for other reasons than to study before the semester started, but was only informed of their status after the semester begun. |
The prepaid tuition fee is not refunded. The prepaid tuition fee for the current semester is refunded. |
The admission decision is revoked because the student was admitted using false qualifications. |
The prepaid tuition fee is not refunded. |
The student’s residence permit is revoked. |
The prepaid tuition fee |
No interest will be added to refunded amounts, and refunds are normally paid to the same account the payment was made from.
To request a refund, the student must personally confirm their given reasons. The student must send their refund request to the Division of Educational Affairs.
The head of the Division of Educational Affairs decides[1] whether to refund prepaid tuition fees.
If the student’s fee status changes, for example through citizenship, they must report this change to the Division of Educational Affairs by submitting verifying documents. However, a change of status does not apply retroactively – see the table above.
Section 3.11 Student debt conditions describes the consequences if tuition fees are not paid
This section contains information about debt caused by unpaid tuition fees as well as other types of debt where the student owes SLU money.
A student who is liable to pay a tuition fee and who fails to pay this by the due date, and has received a reminder from the university, will be excluded from the programme or course until the fee has been paid. A decision to exclude the student from studies means that the student may not participate in teaching, examination or any other activity pertaining to study at the university. In special cases, the university may also decide that degree or course certificates will not be issued until the fees have been paid.
Any debt conditions between a student exempt from paying tuition fees and the responsible department do not affect the student’s right to teaching, examination, reporting of study results or the right to get course or degree certificate.
Tuition fees must be paid for one semester in advance. If a student still has not paid their full tuition fee for a degree programme or course which they have been registered to, they must pay the remaining amount before a course or degree certificate can be issued.
SLU may, to the extent that funds are available, award scholarships to students liable to pay tuition fees.[26] These scholarships can consist of the whole or parts of the tuition fee and should be given to especially qualified students liable to pay tuition.
The following apples for the distribution of such scholarships at SLU:
There are specific provisions for scholarships awarded by foundations and endowment foundations managed by SLU. Regler och delegationsordning för utdelning av stipendier vid SLU (rules and delegation of authority for the distribution of scholarships at SLU – only in Swedish) apply for other scholarships.
At SLU, the Division of Educational Affairs manages scholarships for students liable to pay tuition fees. The head of the Division of Educational Affairs decides on specific principles and criteria for distribution of SLU’s scholarships funded by UHR. Following proposals from the head of the Division of Educational Affairs, the vice-chancellor decides which students will receive scholarships.
Deferment of studies – the student keeps their place, but is allowed to postpone the start of their study period.
Approved leave under specific circumstances – the student takes leave from their studies and is guaranteed a place within the course or programme when their leave is over.
Approved leave without specific reasons – the student takes leave from their studies without submitting an application or without giving specific reasons.
Definitive non-completion of a programme – the student drops out of a programme and ceases to be a programme student.
Non-completion of a course – the student drops out of a course.
National regulations
“If special grounds exist, a higher education institution may decide that students admitted to first or second-cycle studies at the institution:
Specific reasons for deferring studies may be social, medical or other circumstances such as care of a child, military or civilian service, student union assignments, military basic training in accordance with Förordningen (2015:613) om militär grundutbildning (ordinance for military basic training) or postponed holiday in accordance with the Employee’s Right to Educational Leave Act (1974:981).
Specific reasons can also be a fixed-term employment with a probationary period in accordance with section 12 of Lagen (2012:332) om vissa försvarsmaktsanställningar eller tjänstgöring i Försvarsmakten (act on specific appointments or duties in the Swedish Armed Forces). This applies to employees who work part-time as gruppbefäl, soldat or sjöman in accordance with this act.
Unless there are particular reasons to extend a deferment, the maximum allowed time to take a leave of studies is 18 months.[30]
Specific reasons for a student to continue their studies following an approved leave from studies may be social, medical or other circumstances such as care of a child, military or civilian service, military basic training in accordance with Förordningen (2015:613) om militär grundutbildning (ordinance for military basic training) or student union assignments.
Specific reasons can also be a fixed-term employment with a probationary period in accordance with section 12 of Lagen (2012:332) om vissa försvarsmaktsanställningar eller tjänstgöring i Försvarsmakten (act on specific appointments or duties in the Swedish Armed Forces). This applies to employees who work part-time as gruppbefäl, soldat or sjöman in accordance with this act.
Students who can cite specific reasons using a certificate may be granted approved leave from studies and a guaranteed right to resume their course or programme during a specific semester.[31]
Where appropriate, the student must do the following:
The Division of Educational Affairs manages deferments, approved leave from programme studies and non-completion of a programme. Approved leave from studies is documented in the study documentation system Ladok, and decisions regarding leave from studies are always sent to the student.
The Division of Educational Affairs is responsible to ensure that applications concerning deferment, leave from studies and non-completion of a programme are archived together with the decisions relating to these matters.
The responsible department manages non-completion of a course. See section 7.6 Non-completion of a course.
The following can be found on the SLU web:
Students who wish to appeal their requests for deferment of studies or refusal of their application to take leave from studies can turn to the Higher Education Appeals Board. See section 3.16 Appeal a decision.
It is the opinion of SLU that all activities concerning education and its support operations must be based on mutual trust and responsibility between students and teachers. This approach is in both the students’ and university’s best interest since it is a prerequisite to achieve education of the highest possible quality.
Current legislation requires SLU to work to ensure that students play an active part in course and programme development. It is strong wording which comprise all things related to education.
The purpose of this section is to clarify how reciprocity and responsibility might look, to help assess if legal requirements are met as well as to act as a basis for discussion and a joint starting point for student influence issues at SLU. How this is implemented at SLU must vary since prerequisites vary between course and programmes as well as sites.
SLU students have the right to be represented on all decision-making and preparatory bodies which operations are important to education and student situations.
Student influence is based on the students’ unions, which represent themselves. They are in turn regulated by Studentkårsförordningen (SFS 2009:769) (the student union ordinance). Among other things, it states that the students’ unions are responsible to represent all students – even those who choose not to be a part of the union.
Students have the right to be heard, and their opinions must be the base for many decisions relating to education. Courses and programmes are meant for students, and not just the students currently taking them. The university is also responsible to ensure that the students of tomorrow receive education of the highest quality, and it must consider conflicting expectations and requests. If the university makes decisions that do not correspond to student opinion, this should not be viewed as a sign that there is not student influence.
The university must make it easier for student representatives to complete assignments related to student monitoring. Representatives can do this in parallel with their studies or through approved leave from studies for more extensive assignments.
The starting point is to process and prepare matters in good time. That way, students have plenty have time to get involved before a decision must be made. Normally, the student representatives in question should have access to relevant supporting documents and opinions five days before a decision is to be made. Complex matters require even more long-term planning than simpler and routine matters.
However, planning may have to be shorter for pressing issues. Normally, decision-making bodies consisting of student members do not meet during the summer semester.
Legislation considerably requires students to be consulted in other matters which affect them, both in regard to course and programme content as well as the student situation in general. This includes decisions within the administration, often made by a single official. For example, these decisions can concern accessibility, equal opportunities, IT support and the library.
In addition, working groups and other preparatory bodies which must submit supporting documents on issues regarding education and the student situation must also consult the students. The obligation to consult students also applies when a single official makes a decision. The starting point is to process and prepare matters in good time. That way, students have plenty have time to get involved. Normally, the student representatives in question should have access to relevant supporting documents and opinions five days before a decision is to be made.
The right to student influence does not include decisions which affect a single student. However, student representatives can affect the principles for such decisions and follow up on how they are applied.
The whole of SLU, not just teachers, must aim to engage students with activities that concern education. This means that heads of department, those responsible for courses and programmes and managers at all levels must ensure that the university meets this requirement. The programme directors of studies are explicitly responsible to ensure that their programmes include student influence.
Most importantly, it is the vice-chancellor’s responsibility to ensure that there are procedures for student influence on preparatory bodies and for decisions made by a single official. The boards, programme directors of studies and managers together with student representatives must ensure that student influence is accomplished in detail within daily university work.
At SLU, the Joint Committee of Student Unions at SLU, Sluss, appoints students to university-wide bodies as well as to faculty and programme boards. It stands to reason that students appoint their own representatives without the university getting involved, both in regard to the division of members as well as questions concerning personality.
In order to facilitate student influence, SLU must continually keep the Joint Committee of Student Unions at SLU (Sluss) informed of the decision-making bodies that exist at the university, and student representatives are to be offered a place on all preparatory and decision-making bodies involved in education. It can be difficult to decide which bodies are involved in education, but the starting point is that the students decide if they wish to be represented, not the university.
It is incumbent on SLU to provide collective registers on the current preparatory and decision-making bodies and their purposes, but the students’ unions prioritise which bodies they want to be part of. The students’ unions are responsible to report which bodies they will be part of and the persons they have appointed. SLU is responsible to remind students about which bodies lack representation as well as to inform the students when new bodies/working groups are established. This responsibility lies with the persons who made the decision to establish a new body or working group.
At SLU, students have not traditionally been represented on e.g. decision-making bodies relating to environmental monitoring and assessment or research issue committees. There are a few bodies that do not allow student representatives – such as the staff disciplinary board – because it manages disciplinary matters relating to employees. Each delegation of authority states the number of established bodies and their student representatives. See section 2.3 Organisational conditions.
SLU’s delegations of authority state which bodies include students and how many members Sluss must appoint.
Student members are given a sessional allowance.[1] Students not employed at SLU who are regular members[2] of a board, committee, working group, reference group or equivalent established by the vice-chancellor, deans or head of university administration, have the right to a fee of SEK 600 per meeting. If requested, reimbursements can be made for lost salary earnings. The fee normally includes preparatory and supplementary work.
Deputies have the right to receive a fee when they work, i.e. replace a regular member. Student representatives should contact the respective body’s secretary for practical management of their fees.
If a course or programme does not follow this education planning and administration handbook, a course syllabus or programme syllabus, the student must be able to submit complaints, ask questions and give opinions and proposals regarding their education. Complains can also include that SLU does not follow laws or other statutes.
A student (or group of students) dissatisfied about anything should primarily contact the person responsible in order to find a solution to the problem. The simplest way to influence education is to participate in course and programme evaluations.
Students who feel that SLU have broken a law or regulation within the higher education institution field can report this to the Swedish Higher Education Authority (UKÄ) (http://www.uka.se/).
If there are complaints regarding education at course level, the following actions are recommended:
|
Courses |
Programmes |
Processing of an educational matter |
Decision on an educational matter |
Firstly |
Contact the teacher, course coordinator or examiner in question.
|
Contact the programme director of studies in question. |
Contact the administrative officer responsible for the matter in question.
|
Contact the decision-maker if the reason for the decision needs to be clarified.
|
Secondly |
Contact the department director of studies (or equivalent) or the head of department at the department responsible for the course |
Contact the faculty programme director at the respective faculty office; they can
|
Contact the manager at the administrative officer’s division. |
Certain decisions can be appealed. See below. |
Contact |
Department |
Programme |
Managers |
See below. |
Here, educational matters concern admission, credit transfer, issuing qualifications and similar decisions relating to a single student. Grades cannot be appealed.
Students can also turn to their student union, which can provide moderate support.
The following are examples of what can be appealed at the Higher Education Appeals Board:[1]
If you believe a decision is wrong, you can appeal against it.
The appeal must be done in writing and be addressed to the Higher Education Appeals Board. It should, however, be sent to Registrator SLU, Box 7070, 750 07 Uppsala. It should not be sent directly to the Higher Education Appeals Board.
You must ensure that SLU receives your appeal no later than three weeks after notification of the decision against which you are appealing.
In your appeal, state the decision you want to appeal against and how you believe it should be changed. Enclose the actual decision document as this will facilitate the handling of your appeal. If you have documents that support your point of view, enclose them as well.
Sign the appeal and also add your name in block letters. Make sure to include your postal address, email address and phone number.
Provided your appeal reaches SLU before the deadline, the university will investigate whether the decision should be changed. If the decision is changed, you will be notified. Your appeal will then be seen as concerning the new decision. SLU will send the new decision to the Higher Education Appeals Board together with the previous decision to ensure that the board gets an overview of the case.
If SLU does not change the decision, your appeal will be sent to the Higher Education Appeals Board together with the decision, all documents relating to it and a statement of opinion from SLU.
A decision must appealed in writing. In the appeal, the student must state which decision is being appealed and what change they request. The appeal must address the Higher Education Appeals Board, but submitted to SLU, Box 7070, 750 07 Uppsala. The appeal must have been submitted to SLU within three weeks from the day the student was made aware of the decision.
To the start of the chapter
To the start of the page
4.1 Starting points
4.2 Educational development
4.3 University teacher with merit-based salary increment (“Excellent teacher”)
4.4 Degree-awarding powers at department level
4.5 Examiner
4.6 Competence requirements for examiners
4.7 Change of examiner
4.8 Teacher copyright
4.9 Staff liability issues
SLU has the following teacher categories:[1]
However, in everyday speech, the term “teacher” is often used to describe all teaching staff, including those who do not belong to any of the above categories.
See section 4.5 Examiner.
The course coordinator is the teacher or other SLU employee who is operationally responsible for the implementation of the course. For contracted courses, the course coordinator can be a teacher or other employee from another higher education institution. The course coordinator and examiner can be the same person.
SLU’s vision, objectives and strategy to attract, recruit and maintain teaching expertise is described in other governing documents. Among other things, see the SLU strategies and strategic direction documents.
Rules concerning employment at SLU can be found in other governing documents. Among other things, see the appointments procedure at SLU.
The faculty boards[2] plan teaching appointments to give courses and programmes the prerequisites for quality based on an academic or artistic footing and on proven experience.
The responsible department must ensure that students have access to contact information for
The faculty offices are responsible to ensure that contact information for programme directors of studies can be found on the student web programme pages.
Courses and programmes must meet high scientific and teaching quality requirements. SLU places great importance on such qualifications when employing and promoting teachers. There must be opportunities for educational and other types of professional development since they contribute to new thinking and course development as well as specialised subject knowledge and research connections.
The appointment procedures at SLU regulate the competence requirements for various types of employment.
The Educational Development Unit (EPU) at the Division of Educational Affairs works to promote higher education development at SLU. The unit is responsible for the university’s courses in higher education teaching.
The title of “excellent teacher” enables SLU to reward and highlight skilled and educationally aware teachers. Excellent teachers are expected to actively take part of quality assurance work relating to education and teaching within the subject area and the university.
The title of “excellent teacher” enables SLU to reward and highlight skilled and educationally aware teachers. Excellent teachers are expected to actively take part of quality assurance work within the subject area and the university.
The vice-chancellor decides on specific rules and instructions regarding the appointment of excellent teachers. Teachers (lecturers, senior lecturers and professors) or those with corresponding expertise and duties employed for an indefinite period can be appointed excellent teachers.
In order to be appointed excellent teacher at SLU, the applicant must have broad teaching expertise. In order to be appointed an excellent teacher, the candidate must have expertise within the following five knowledge areas:
The Board for the Appointment of Excellent Teachers (Nex) manages calls and applications regarding the title of excellent teacher.
Complete information with instructions for excellent teacher applicants at SLU can by following the link below.
Courses at first- and second-cycle level at SLU are among other things classified according to the subject content. SLU subjects are listed in Annex 3: First cycle and second cycle subjects at SLU.
Some subjects are main fields of study and act as a basis for general qualifications. Main fields of study at SLU are also listed in Annex 3: First cycle and second cycle subjects at SLU.
In order for a department to have the right to assess first-cycle students within one of SLU’s main fields of study, it must have teachers with a doctorate employed for an indefinite period and who have relevant subject knowledge and/or researchers employed for an indefinite period with docent expertise within a relevant field.
In order for a department to assess students at second-cycle level within one of SLU’s main fields of study, it must employ at least one professor with relevant subject knowledge.
In order for a department to assess students studying subjects other than SLU’s main fields of study, it must employ at least one teacher within a relevant subject area.
In order for a department to assess students taking courses belonging to two main fields of study or subjects (double-classed courses), the department must have degree-awarding powers within both main fields of study/subjects. Otherwise, another department that has the power to award degrees in the other main field of study or subject must award the degree together with the responsible department. The co-responsible department must be listed in the course syllabus.
For contracted courses from another higher education institution, the competence requirements from that institution apply to the examiner.
The responsible faculty can decide to grant time-limited exemptions regarding the right to award degrees to a department in relation to a subject or main field of study.
Each faculty must define which of SLU’s main fields of study that the faculty departments and any units are allowed to assess. This must also be done for subjects that do not constitute main fields of study at SLU.
The faculty board decides which bodies within the faculty organisation will decide on each department’s right to award degrees.
The examiner grades student performance within a course.
Grading criteria connects grades to levels of meeting a course’s intended learning outcomes. A pass grade means that the student has fundamentally met the objectives in the course syllabus.
“Unless otherwise provided by the higher education institution, a grade shall be awarded on completion of a course. [− − −] The grade shall be determined by a teacher specifically nominated by the higher education institution (the examiner).”[1]
“The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences may also appoint someone who does not hold a teaching post to act as examiner in first, second and third-cycle courses and study programmes.”[2]
As a rule, each course must have one examiner. Information about the examiner for individual courses must be available on the course page no later than when the course begins.
There are specific rules for independent projects. See chapter 9. Independent project (degree project).
For contracted courses or other forms of cooperation with another higher education institution, the examiner can be employed by the other institution. In those cases, the rules at the higher education institution in question apply to the examiner.
The head of department[3] at the responsible department appoints examiners. See the section Excellent teachers.
4.4 Degree-awarding powers at department level, 4.6 Competence requirements for examiners and 4.7 Change examiner.
The faculties must document and follow up examiners for each course.
The responsible department must ensure that the examiner is listed on the course page no later than when the course begins.
Examiners
Other teachers may take part in the examination by co-grading in accordance with the examiner’s instructions, but it is the examiner who is ultimately responsible and makes the grading decision. There are specific rules for independent projects. See chapter 9. Independent project (degree project).
Examiners at first-cycle level:
Examiners at second-cycle level:
In accordance with SLU’s current appointment procedures, the person has a teaching post as one of the following:
In accordance with SLU’s previous appointment procedures, the person has a teaching post as one of the following:
The person does not have a teaching post but does have a
Time-limited exemptions concerning the right to award degrees within a course are granted by the responsible faculty.
For courses with considerable elements of occupational skills training, an equivalence assessment may be made of the student’s relevant professional experience. An equivalence assessment may also be made of artistic development work for courses within the artistic field.
The responsible faculty makes equivalence assessments.
“A student who has taken two examinations in a course or a part of a course without obtaining a pass grade is entitled to the nomination of another examiner, unless there are special reasons to the contrary.”[1]
This request can also concern nominating another teacher to take part of the assessment without acting as examiner. Special reasons speaking against the student’s request can for example be that there are no examiners or teachers with the right qualifications.
The head of department decides whether to change examiner or participating teacher for individual students.
The student must submit a written request to change examiner (or co-grading teacher) to the head of department or department director of studies (or equivalent) at the responsible department.
Intellectual property rights involve rights that have been or can be protected as intellectual property in accordance with current legislation, e.g. patents, copyright, trademark, design protection and plant variety rights.
According to SLU’s intellectual property rights policy, the starting point is that intellectual property rights created in relation to university teaching and research is given to the originator. Both students and employees at SLU can be originators (i.e. have copyright) of literary and artistic works. Everyone is treated equally in this sense. SLU has no right to any inventions or similar that are created in connection with student works, regardless of whether they are patentable or not.
Reproducing other people’s texts, tables, images and other illustrations can be a violation of copyright. This applies even if a citation is marked as such and the source is given.
Teachers who develop their own teaching material during their employment own the material copyright. However, SLU has the right to use teaching material developed within the framework of the employment. It means, among other things, that SLU has the right to make the material available and to make copies of it, both printed and electronic.
Students are not allowed to publish or spread teaching material without the teacher’s permission.
Audio/video recordings or photography relating to teaching is only allowed if this is stated in the course syllabus, or following agreement with the students in question. This applies to all types of teaching, including excursions, study visits, etc. It is not allowed to publish or spread photos, film or audio relating to teaching through e.g. social media without the teacher’s permission.
Students with disabilities may receive learning support, which can include, for example, audio or video recordings relating to teaching. See 3.5 Study with a disability. The recordings are only meant for personal use, and they too require the teacher’s permission.
If a staff member intentionally or through carelessness disregards their obligations, this may be regarded as neglect of duty. In certain cases this will lead to disciplinary measures in the form of a warning or salary deduction.
The staff disciplinary board deals with issues regarding the following:[1]
The head of department at the staff member’s department decides whether to report staff liability issues to the vice-chancellor. If the staff member works within university administration, their head of division makes the decision.
The staff disciplinary board decides whether neglect of duty will lead to measures or not. The Government Disciplinary Board for Higher Officials decides on measures for higher posts.
If a student wants to make a complaint about a staff member at SLU, they must primarily turn to the head of department where the person in question is employed. Also see section 3.15 Complain procedures. Students can also turn to their student union, which can provide moderate support on these issues.
The staff disciplinary board only handles serious staff liability cases.
To the start of the chapter
To the start of the page
5.1 Starting points
5.2 Course evaluations
5.3 Programme evaluations
5.4. Student welfare follow-up
5.5 Dialogues on quality
Quality assurance procedures are systematic efforts to improve courses and programmes in every way in accordance with our values and strategy. The procedures concern educational content and academic levels, but also the conditions provided by the university to ensure that the students assimilate as much knowledge as possible when studying, i.e. both the physical and student welfare environment. For example, they can concern planning and implementing courses, access to equipment and rooms as well as an open, validating discussion climate where everyone gets to speak on their terms.
Working with quality issues gives the students the opportunity to practice developed approaches. This will benefit them in their future professional lives. From an early stage, SLU is responsible to clarify that the students are personally responsible for their education, which includes quality development.
SLU’s quality assurance system monitors quality assurance procedures at the university. See below.
“Quality assurance procedures are the shared concern of staff and students at higher education institutions.”[1]
A national system for quality assurance within higher education is being put into practice during 2017–2022. Within this framework, the Swedish Higher Education Authority (UKÄ) is reviewing the following: quality assurance procedures at higher education institutions, course and programme evaluations, degree-awarding powers and thematic evaluations.
SLU’s quality assurance procedures and quality assurance are described in the following documents:
Framework for the quality assurance of courses and study programmes at SLU (strategy document)[2]
Instructions for systematic quality assurance at SLU (instructions for applying the framework/strategy)[3]
SLU’s quality assurance system can be summarised in the following way:
Quality assurance consists of regularly recurring and systematic present-state analyses and dialogues on quality. The present-state analysis is carried out by the programme board in question. Quality dialogues are held between the persons responsible for education at university level (Board of Education) and the programme board in question. After the quality dialogues have been carried out, the Board of Education makes an assessment of whether the quality assurance procedures relating to courses and programmes are sufficient enough to ensure that the operation in question is of high quality. The Board of Education decides on cases where quality assurance inspires adequate measures to ensure continued high-quality development.
Course evaluations (see section 5.2 Course evaluations) and the recurring student welfare survey (see section 5.4. Student welfare follow-up) are important quality assurance tools. Through programme evaluations (see section 5.3 Programme evaluations) and alumni surveys, other aspects of educational quality can be highlighted, but these methods are not used as much or as systematically as the above.
Different parts of the organisation are responsible for education quality at SLU.[4] The main quality assurance procedures are the responsibility of the individual employees in their daily work: students, doctoral students and staff.
Course evaluations must be followed up and used as a tool in the quality development of courses. They must be handled in such a way that both student and teacher integrity is preserved. Therefore, students must have the right to be anonymous when writing course evaluations.
Good higher education presupposes well-designed and implemented course evaluations. This in turn presupposes reciprocity. The course evaluation system is based on enabling students to give constructive feedback on courses and teaching. Teachers must then use the evaluations as a valuable instrument for quality development. Students should feel that their opinions are met with interest and respect.
Student feedback is part of the course, and they are not reimbursed for their time. Since course evaluations are voluntary for students, it is important that the responsible department provides information on and organises course evaluations with the aim to receive as many responses as possible. It is suitable to invite the student representative who takes part in compiling the results to also take part of the work described above as well as scheduling the course evaluation session.
“Higher education institutions shall enable students who are participating in or have completed a course to express their experiences of and views on the course through a course evaluation to be organised by the higher education institution.”[1]
“The higher education institution shall collate the course evaluations and provide information about their results and any actions prompted by the course evaluations. The results shall be made available to the students.”[2]
Course evaluations results and conclusions must be reported in the joint electronic course evaluation system Evald. Where appropriate, information on course adjustments, and/or reasons to keep criticised content and design should be listed in the system. The results reported in the compilations are number responses for issues common to all courses, as well as summaries of student and teacher feedback.
Before the course is carried out again, the results from previous course evaluations must be presented, as well as information on any changes caused by previous course evaluations.
A student has the right to represent the student group and take part of the compilation of course evaluation feedback. This work is reimbursed with SEK 400 per course. This fee makes up some of the costs for course implementation, which means that the department in question does not receive special resources for this purpose. The amount is the same regardless of the credit amount or number of students.
SLU teachers and students are jointly responsible to ensure that course evaluations are carried out. The responsible department must:
All answers are reported, regardless of the number.[1] However, when assessing results, the number of answers and responders must be taken into account.
Students who participate in, or completed, a degree programme are given an opportunity to express their experiences and views on the programme. An SLU objective is to carry out continual programme evaluations in connection when students apply for a qualification. Programme evaluations must be followed up and used as a tool in the quality development of courses and programmes. In addition, there must be procedures for following up programme students (student completion and non-completion).
Students who participate in, or completed, a degree programme are given an opportunity to express their experiences and views on the programme by completing a programme evaluation. Programme evaluations must be followed up and used as a tool in the quality development of courses and programmes.
The programme boards are responsible to carry out degree programme evaluations.[2] Programme directors of studies are responsible to follow up student results, both qualitatively and quantitatively.[2] The Division of Educational Affairs and the Division of Planning must provide system support of this follow-up.[2]
SLU continually carries out a student welfare survey.
The Student Welfare Council (Strå) is responsible for the student welfare survey.[2]
Joint quality themes and standards are specified in the Framework for the quality assurance of courses and study programmes at SLU.
The instructions for systematic quality assurance of courses and programmes at SLU state, among other things, what is expected of all concerned parties before, during and following quality dialogues.
The instructions for systematic quality assurance of courses and programmes at SLU list, among other things, planned review cycles at an annual or long-term basis (6 years), working methods and documentation.
To the start of the chapter
To the start of the page
6.1 Starting points
6.2 Course syllabus
6.3 Grading system
6.4 Course instances
6.5 Termination of a course
6.6 Course modules
In order to give students good conditions to carry out their studies with good results, it is important to provide them with clear information early on.
In order to carry out a course, the following is required:
The department in question is responsible to implement a course. There may be one or more departments that are jointly responsible to implement a course.
It is important to have joint timeframes for courses (start and end dates). This enables students to choose courses more freely and to jointly study various courses.
“A course shall have a course syllabus.”[1]
SLU’s rules are based on the rules stipulated in the Higher Education Ordinance and SUHF recommendations. This means that each course syllabus at SLU must include the following:
These aspects are described further below.
Course codes are generated by Slukurs. The course title should relate to the content.
The scope of the course must be listed in credits. A course normally comprises 15 credits and is taught full-time for a period (i.e. half a semester). If justified, two courses of 7.5 credits can be offered for a period. See section 2.4 Academic year and semester dates.
Summer courses, distance courses and freestanding courses not taught at full-time can have different scopes. The Board of Education (UN) can grant exemptions from the joint timeframes for courses within individual programmes if there is reason to do so.[3] There are specific rules for independent projects. See chapter 9. Independent project (degree project)..
Subject classification depends on the course content. Annex 3: First cycle and second cycle subjects at SLU. It includes a list of subjects and main fields of study.
At SLU, a course can be classified into one or two subjects (double classification). However, independent projects (degree projects) can only be classified into one subject.
Double classification should not be used in a perfunctory manner; a course should only have a double classification if its content makes up a clear and important part of both subjects, and if there is substantial progression in both subjects/main fields of study. Double classification can be used when a course contains both a traditional subject discipline and a synthesis and/or sector-related applications.
A doubly classified course can be included in qualification requirements for both listed subjects/main fields of study. Possible module divisions cannot divide a doubly classified course into two subjects. In such cases, it is better with two separate courses.
SLU has the following level classification:
The progressive specialisation of the course within the main field of study for general qualifications should be indicated using the codes recommended by SUHF (G1N, G1F, G2F, G2E, A1N, A1F, A1E, A2E, GXX, AXX – see the instructions for course syllabuses). A single course can only be available at one level and include one specialisation.
See section 6.3 grading system. In addition, the following standard text is automatically displayed in Slukurs:
“The various grade requirements for a course are listed in the grading criteria which must be made available when the course starts at the latest.”
The course language can either be Swedish or English.
Specific entry requirements must be listed, and the following applies:
Course objectives must:
The content must include a short description of both the subject content and course implementation.
The forms for assessing student performance concern how to carry out examinations and what is required to pass a course. If the course contains compulsory elements, this must be indicated.
In addition, the following standard text is automatically displayed in Slukurs:
Transitional provisions must be listed:
Any other regulations not covered in other parts of the course syllabus must be stated if necessary. In addition, the following standard text is displayed in Slukurs:
The department coordinating the course, and any other jointly responsible departments, must be listed.
If the course is included in one or several degree programmes, this connection must be included, but it is not part of the actual course syllabus. It should also say whether the course is offered as a freestanding course.
If another course takes the place of, is replaced with or overlaps with the course in question, this information must also be included.
The responsible department documents the course syllabus in both Swedish and English in Slukurs.
If cooperation stretches over faculties, the participating parties must be consulted in the manner agreed upon by the programme boards in question.
The programme board approves[5] course syllabuses and any programme connections. The course syllabus must include the decision date and decision-making body as well as when the course syllabus begins to apply.
The programme director of studies decides[6] when to revise course syllabuses. When a course syllabus is revised, a new version with the same course code is created. The following remains unchanged:
Rephrasing and clarifications of entry requirements and intended learning outcomes, which do not affect the content, may be added in a revision. The programme board can decide to change the responsible department without changing the course code.
The faculty office must submit the following for archiving:
There are instructions on how to write uniform course syllabuses. See Links.
The course syllabus must be available on the SLU web and universityadmissions.se as soon as possible – when course applications are open at the latest. SLU applies joint time frames for planning and decisions on the offered course and programmes. See 2: Annual cycle for course and programme planning.
“Unless otherwise provided by the higher education institution, a grade shall be awarded on completion of a course. The higher education institution may determine which grading system is to be used.”[1]
SLU uses a four-point criterion-referenced grading scale:
If a decision has been made to exempt a certain course module (module/test) or a certain course or programme, a two-point criterion-referenced grading scale is used:
SLU follows SUHF recommendations regarding the application of the ECTS Grading Table in the following way:
Exceptions from the four-point grading scale can for e.g. be made for introductory, short courses (so-called display courses) and practical skill training courses, excursions, etc. when assessment is primarily based on student participation.
The amount of courses with allowed exceptions:
The grading scale for course modules (previous modules or tests) may differ from the scale that applies for the course in general. See section 6.6 Course modules.
Valid reasons to be exempted from the four-point grading scale that applies for all courses within a degree programme is that there is no need for grading scales. The reasons are:
The following degree programmes are currently exempted from the four-point grading scale:
At a student’s request, the Division of Educational Affairs issues a separate certificate on the division of grades for new courses.
A course instance is the start and end date for a course.
Several course instances in an academic year or for an entire degree programme are described in a course schedule. Example:
Year |
Period I |
Period II |
Period III |
Period IV |
|
1 |
Course α, 15 credits |
Courseβ, |
Course η, 7,5 credits |
Course θ, |
Course δ, |
2 |
Course γ, 15 credits |
Course ζ, 15 credits |
Independent project, 30 credits |
The basic idea is that courses are open to freestanding students. It is important that SLU includes long-term planning of its range of courses.
Programme courses can be exempted if it is difficult or unsuitable to offer the course in question to freestanding students, e.g. capacity limitations, content and/or entry requirements.
Courses taught in English may be exempted from the UHR’s English web, if it is difficult or unsuitable to offer the course to freestanding, international students. It is important to make a conscious choice of which courses will be advertised on the English web.
Information regarding which courses will start in the coming academic year must be available on the SLU web and antagning.se no later than when the admission period for the autumn semester begins. However, summer courses may be added later.
A course should be advertised as soon as possible in order to provide information before each admission period. At this time, both the course syllabus and course date must be approved. See Annex 2: Annual cycle for course and programme planning.
The programme board decides on:
A course may be included in several degree programmes and therefore affect different programme boards. However, there must always be a responsible programme board for each course. This must be documented in Slukurs.
If cooperation stretches over faculties, the participating parties must be consulted in the manner agreed upon by the programme boards in question.
SLU applies joint timeframes for planning and decisions on the offered course and programmes. See 2: Annual cycle for course and programme planning.
A course instance is the start and end date for a course.
It is important for the students to have access to a predictable set of offered courses. Therefore, programme boards must work not to terminate course instances.
A course instance included in an established range of courses offered may only be terminated in exceptional cases, and only if the decision can be justified.
The same decision-making body that established the range of courses offered must decide whether to terminate a course instance. See section 6.4 Course instances. A decision to terminate a course must be made by 1 June before the autumn semester begins and by 15 November before the spring semester begins.
Compulsory programme courses may not be terminated if there are programme students who plan on taking the course at a regular rate of study. This includes students who return following granted deferment/approved leave from studies.
An elective programme course may be terminated if, among other things, it is expected that a maximum of 10 students will participate. In these cases, an alternative course must be offered. The alternative course must primarily correspond to the applied course in regard to entry requirements, and also contribute towards the fulfilment of the degree requirements in a corresponding manner.
Courses without a programme connection may be terminated if it is expected that a maximum of 15 students will participate. An alternative course cannot always be offered.
In exceptional cases, SLU can terminat a course after admission decisions have been sent to students, but only if one of the following requirements are met:
The responsible department must carry out a compulsory programme course even if the examiner or other teacher resigns, takes sick leave or equivalent.
The programme board must ensure that there is an alternative course instance that corresponds to a terminated, elective programme course instance.
If a responsible department wishes to terminate a course instance, it must submit a request to the programme board in question, which makes the decision. If a course instance is terminated, the programme board must quickly notify both the students who applied to the course and the Division of Educational Affairs.
The faculty office which supports the programme board in question must submit the decision to terminate a course instance for archiving.
A course module is a part of a course in the form of credits. It was previously called a module or test in Ladok.
Several results notes relating to a course module can be entered in Ladok. When all results have been reported, the course module is listed as passed in Ladok.
The following examples illustrate the relationship between a course module and course results: KE0000 Chemistry, 15 credits.
Normally, courses of 15 credits or more must include course modules.
Course module advantages:
Course modules (previously called modules or tests) must be listed for each course instance:
The examiner decides how to divide a course into course modules. The responsible department must enter the modules in Ladok before the deadline.
Course modules from previous course instances remain if no new modules are added.
SLU applies joint timeframes for planning and decisions on the offered course and programmes. See 2: Annual cycle for course and programme planning.
It is important that the students have a predictable course offering. Therefore, the programme boards must strive not to terminate courses without having valid reasons to do so. In these instances, forward planning is key.
Established course syllabuses are legally binding, higher education institutions are obligated to follow them. Students who have been admitted and subsequently registered in a course have long-term rights in regard to completing their studies.
Transitional rules must be established in connection with a decision to phase out a course. These rules must be documented in the soon-to-be terminated course syllabus – see section 6.2 Course syllabus.[1]
Reasons to terminate a course:
The need for forward planning depends on the following circumstances:
Note that terminating a degree programme does not automatically mean that the included courses stop applying. If the courses are not to be continued, they have to be terminated in a particular order, and the decisions to do so must be in accordance with the current delegation of authority.
Terminating a course means that there must be a decision to repeal the course syllabus in question. A decision to repeal means that the course syllabus stops applying after the necessary termination period needed to enable already registered students to complete their studies. Normally, renewed exams are offered for two years after the last course instance. Section 8.5 Compulsory steps 8.12 Renewed examination (retake session) limitations state the minimum of what must apply when completing a terminated course.
During the phase-out period, the (repealed) course syllabus is still a legally binding document. Subsequently, the course syllabus stops applying and therefore, the university’s obligations to it also stops applying.
The programme boards decide whether to terminate a course, which usually occurs in connection with a course schedule or course instance decisions for the coming academic year.[2]
The faculty office that supports the responsible programme board is responsible for adding the below information to the terminated course syllabus.
The responsible department must provide affected students with relevant information.
A proposal to repeal a course syllabus (with a course code) must contain the following:
The reason(s) for terminating a course must be listed in the decision to repeal the course syllabus. The following must be added to the terminated course syllabus:
A proposal to repeal a course syllabus (with a course code) must contain the following:
The following must be added to a terminated course syllabus:
Information for affected students
Affected students must be notified in writing, either through email or letter. The information in question must be documented. The following must be included:
“Affected students” mean the following:
When a decision is made to repeal a course syllabus (with a course code), the following applies:
Re-registration is allowed during the phase-out period.
To the start of the chapter
To the start of the page
7.1 Early course information
7.2 Course instance application
7.3 Course instance admission
7.4 Start of a course
7.5 Course instance registration
7.6 Non-completion of a course
In order to give students good conditions to carry out their studies with good results, it is important to provide them with clear information early on. This is particularly important for students with disabilities.
The reading list must be available on the course page at least eight (8) weeks before the course starts.
The timetable must be available on the course page at least four (4) weeks before the course starts. The timetable must include:
If the course includes study trip (or equivalent) costs, this must be stated four weeks before the course starts, at the latest. See section 3.8 Student costs and reimbursements.
Grading criteria must be available on the course page no later than when the course starts. All the pass grade requirements must be clearly listed for the course in question.
They must also include the exam timeframes for the course, and whether a student must complete the course within a certain time to receive higher than a pass grade.
See chapter 8. Examination (tests) and compulsory steps.
The responsible department must:
The course coordinator must approve the reading list and timetable, unless the responsible department has decided something else.
The examiner must decide the grading criteria. See section 4.5 Examiner. Grading criteria for independent projects are discussed in chapter 9. Independent project (degree project).
“A person seeking admission to first or second-cycle higher education shall apply within the time prescribed and in compliance with the procedures laid down by the higher education institution.”[1]
The Swedish Agency for Higher Education Services (UHR) coordinates higher education applications in Sweden. The application deadline for each semester can be found at www.antagning.se or www.universityadmissions.se.
Applications can be made at:
Normally, programme students must apply for coming programme courses. When no application is necessary to study a programme course, this must be stated in the programme information on the SLU web.
Students must apply before the set deadline. However, certain courses allow late applications if there are places available. The course application window closes 3 weeks after a course starts. The course coordinator must contact antagning@slu.se in instances where courses require longer application periods (e.g. placement courses). It is possible to apply late for independent project course instances (degree projects) during the whole course period.
During the second week of a course, there must be a check of which students are actually taking the course. See section 7.5 Course instance registration. Students who wish to take a course but have forgotten to apply must immediately submit a late application in order to be admitted and registered.
Applications can be submitted at www.antagning.se or www.universityadmissions.se, depending on whether the course language is Swedish or English. There are special course application channels for incoming exchange students.
“Any specific entry requirements imposed shall be totally essential for a student to be able to benefit from the course or study programme.”[1]
“A higher education institution shall waive one or more entry requirements if the applicant has the capacity to benefit from the course or study programme without meeting the entry requirements.”[2]
Students who have not met the entry requirements when the admission decision is made can still be admitted. However, in those cases, they may have to meet the requirements when the course starts.
If the applicant must reply to the admission decision, the decision must include:
An applicant who has been admitted to a course and accepted it, but who does not intend to take the course, must decline as soon as possible at www.antagning.se or www.universityadmissions.se.
The SLU Board has approved admission regulations for education at first-cycle and second-cycle level at SLU. See Links.
SLU follows UHR guidelines and SUHF recommendations relating to the area.
A student can see if they have a waiting list number at www.antagning.se or www.universityadmissions.se. If the student is given a place in the course, the responsible department must notify them via email. After receiving an offer to take the course, the student must reply within 24 hours.
Normally, all course instances are open for late admission for two weeks after the course starts, if there are any available places. Late admission is then closed, unless the department director of studies (equivalent) at the responsible department request an exemption. Independent project (degree project) courses are generally exempted from this rule. Students who have applied for degree courses are put on a waiting list if admission takes place two weeks after the course starts. The course coordinator in question then decides whether the student can take the course.
The student must:
The head of admissions decides the following[3]:
The course coordinator or the person appointed by the course coordinator must, if necessary, do the following:
The applicant receives an email saying that their admission decision is available under My Studies at www.antagning.se or www.universityadmissions.se. If the student is given a place in the course through the waiting list, the responsible department must notify them via email.
Every course instance has some sort of start. They can be arranged in different ways.
In order to give students good conditions to carry out their studies with good results, it is important to provide them with clear information early on.
If self-registration is used – see section 7.5 Course instance registration – students should be reminded to register for the course.
The examiner is responsible to provide information on examinations and grading. The course coordinator is responsible for other information and to make the course information above available on the course page within a given time, unless the department decides something else.
The responsible department must archive information about each course date in accordance with Annex 4: Archiving course information.
By registering, the student confirms that they accept their place in the course.
Self-registration means that the student personally registers for the course.
Continued registration is done every new semester when a course runs over several semesters.
Re-registration can be done when a student needs to study (parts of) a course once again. However, students do not need to re-register in Ladok to retake an examination, but they must register for the exam as usual.
The responsible department must offer the students the possibility to register themselves or register them no later than when the course starts. Self-registration is the norm, but it does not apply to the first course within a first-cycle degree programme.
Normally, self-registration is open five (5) weekdays before the course starts and the day when the course starts. The responsible department can decide other self-registration times. However, courses with applicants on a waiting list should close self-registration when the course starts in order to contact the applicants and offer them places.
When the responsible department registers students (i.e. when self-registration is not allowed), the student must be registered in Ladok as soon as possible, no later than three weekdays after the course starts or three weekdays after the student began taking the course.
A student who does not attend the course when it starts and who has not self-registered may lose their place unless they have notified the responsible department beforehand stating why they cannot attend the beginning of the course. Accepted reasons are listed in section 8.6 Special reasons.
If a student has not lost their place on a course that has started, they can start taking the course after it has begun.
The course coordinator must decide:
You must be authorised to register students on courses and to work in Ladok.
If a student has lost their place, the message can be formulated in the following way: “The course started today. You have not registered or participated in the start of the course. In addition, you have not notified us that you could not attend. This means that you have lost your place in the course. Your place will be given to an applicant on the waiting list.”
Non-completion of a course means that the student drops out of a course. The student must submit a written document stating that they will not be completing the course.
If a student wants to drop out of a course within three weeks after the course starts, this is called early non-completion of a course. If the student drops out early, they can apply for the course at a later date.
If a student wants to drop out of a course later than three weeks after the course starts, they cannot apply for the course again. If they still apply for the course, they will be encouraged to contact the responsible department for information on re-registration and renewed examination (retake session).
The student must:
The responsible department must:
The three-week check can be carried out by sending an email to students who have not participated at all or who have been frequently absent/inactive during the first three weeks of the course.
8.1 Examinations (tests) and grading
8.2 Examination times, locations and registration
8.3 Rules for written examinations
8.4 Other types of examination (tests)
8.5 Compulsory steps
8.6 Special reasons
8.7 Grading decisions
8.8 Reporting results and documentation
8.9 Feedback and handing back written examinations
8.10 Alternative examination session
8.11 Renewed examination (retake session)
8.12 Renewed examination (retake session) limitations
There are various forms of examinations (tests). An examination can be made up of several parts, e.g. a number of laboratory sessions, seminars, excursions or guest lectures. As a rule, results for such exams are not communicated until all parts have been completed.
“Unless otherwise provided by the higher education institution, a grade shall be awarded on completion of a course.”[1] The Administrative Procedure Act also includes requirements on the exercise of official authority that is examinations.
The examiner must grade a student’s performance on a course in accordance with the course syllabus objectives. See section 4.5 Examiner. This means making a qualitative assessment of the student’s knowledge, skills and abilities, based on one or several examinations. Quantitative assessments can also be required to pass a course, e.g. being present for compulsory steps.
Unless the course syllabus states otherwise, exams are held in the course language. However, students have the right to submit answers in Swedish in a course taught in English, since it is the official language of all public authorities[1]. Nevertheless, this may mean that certain internationalisation objectives in the course syllabus became harder to meet.
A passed examination cannot be retaken to achieve a higher grade.
The listed grading criteria may differ between course instances for the same course. A student who completes a course following leave is assessed in accordance with the criteria that apply when the course is completed, regardless of the criteria that applied when they began taking the course.
For programmes offered in collaboration with another higher education institution, other terms may apply for examinations. Normally, the rules of the responsible department at the higher education institution apply.
Examinations may be held with an individual or a group of individuals, but must be devised in such a way that an individual assessment can be made. Group assignments, for example, must be presented in such a way that examiner can perceive individual student contributions.
The examiner may request supplementary presentation from the student if this is necessary for assessing their individual performance.
Course syllabuses include examination formats and requirements to pass a course, which are the bases of assessing student performance. See section 6.2 Course syllabus. However, deviations from the course syllabus may be made in the following cases:
A course can include bonus-giving assignments, even though they might not be listed in the course syllabus. However, there cannot be any requirements that state that students must complete such assignments to pass the course. The examiner is responsible for providing information on bonus-giving assignments when the course starts.
The awarding of a higher than pass grade (4 or 5) may depend on passing the course before the deadlines set by the examiner. If so, this must be clear from the grading criteria for the higher grade levels.
In general, the following applies:
A course can be divided into modules. See section 6.6 Course modules. Several result notes relating to a course module can be entered in Ladok. When all results have been reported, the course module is listed as passed in Ladok.
The examiner must decide the grading criteria. See section 4.5 Examiner. Grading criteria for independent projects are discussed in chapter 9. Independent project (degree project).
An examination (exam) can either be written (on paper or digital) or oral. Where applicable, the rules for other examination formats apply.
SLU may allow a student to take an exam at another location, if the exam can be carried out in a fair manner and without including extra costs. This means that for a given exam, all students must take the same exam at the same time. Other SLU sites should be selected first.
A student may take an exam at another location because they:
The student must contact the examiner or course coordinator with their request (see the correct form under Links). When applying to take an exam at another location, they must investigate whether the exam will be held in a specific room and if there will be an invigilator there.
Before every examination, the examiner must decide if SLU will allow a student to take an exam at another location. It is not enough if the student has reason to do so – it must also be fair, and resources must be considered.
The course coordinator decides whether to change the examination location or time, and they are responsible to inform the students of any changes.
Information on how students apply to take an exam.
This section concerns written examinations (on paper or digital) at the responsible department in question. Other rules may apply for contracted courses, joint programmes with other higher education institutions or exams taken at another higher education institution.
Written examinations must be carried out in such a way that the student identities are unknown to the examiner when they assess the answers. However, the invigilators must check and document which students are taking the exam.
See section 8.2 Examination times, locations and registration.
All invigilators must have completed and passed special training. However, the academic year 2018/19 acts as a transitional period where it is possible to work as an invigilator even if you have not passed the training. An invigilator must also submit a written certificate confirming that they have read and agree to follow the current examination rules at SLU.
After 1 September 2019, examiner or co-grading teachers are not allowed to act as invigilators.
The number of invigilators is based on the number of students during an exam session:
The student must do the following:
The invigilator must:
The room must be orderly and quiet during the exam. Students may not speak to each other.
If necessary, an invigilator can demand that a student change their seat during the exam.
When there are two or more invigilators in the room, one must be seated in front of the students and one behind them. If there is only one invigilator, they must be seated in front of the students.
Invigilators must stay focused on the students and walk around the room at appropriate intervals.
Invigilators are not allowed to disturb the students. This also applies when an invigilator speaks to another employee or a specific student during the exam.
Invigilators, course coordinators and/or examiners may check any aids and a student’s personal belongings on the table at any time.
If the toilet is not directly connected to the exam room, an invigilator must accompany the student and wait outside.
Students may be granted shorter breaks under the supervision of an invigilator. During these breaks, students and invigilators may not speak.
Students are not allowed to leave the room permanently without submitting their exam. They must submit their exam to the invigilator even if the exam is blank.
Every student must provide identification when submitting an exam.
All submitted loose papers must include the student’s anonymity code. The invigilator must count and take note of the number of submitted papers. See section Anonymity codes below.
If secrecy applies, this must be included on the exam. In these cases, all given examination material must be submitted when the exam is complete. Also see section 8.9 Feedback and handing back written examinations
After the exam is finished, the invigilator must submit all student papers, the student list and code list in accordance with the instructions for the exam session in question. See section Anonymity codes below.
Students may request alternative exam arrangements. In order to do so, they need a recommendation from a learning support coordinator.
Alternative exam arrangements may include giving the student extra time to take the exam, the use of a computer with speech synthesis and spell check, allowing them to take the exam in a smaller group or dividing it into two sessions. See section 3.5 Study with a disability.
Students with decisions and recommendations from SLU regarding learning support who wish to have alternative exam arrangements must contact the course coordinator or course administrator in good time – preferably when the course starts, but no later than fifteen (15) weekdays before the examination takes place. The examiner decides if and what alternative arrangements are possible.
It can be difficult for students with alternative exam arrangements to remain anonymous, but it must be done to the extent possible.
If there is an emergency evacuation (e.g. fire alarm), all students must leave the room in accordance with the invigilator’s and/or the person in charge instructions. The exam is concluded immediately during an evacuation.
The invigilator must inform the examiner or course coordinator that the exam was interrupted. The examiner then decides whether to assess the submitted exams.
Students must be offered another chance to take the exam. It counts as the exam session that was forced to be interrupted due to evacuation. See section 8.10 Alternative examination session. The course coordinator is responsible to inform the students when the alternative session will take place.
If an invigilator discovers or suspects that a student is cheating, i.e. is using prohibited aids or other forms of deception during the exam, the invigilator must:
The invigilator is not allowed to force the student to submit any evidence. Body searches or other coercive measures are not allowed.
When suspected of cheating, a student may not be dismissed or forced to stop taking the exam.
There will be a special investigation of the event following the exam. Disciplinary measures and management of disciplinary cases are described in section 10.4 Disciplinary measures.
If a student acts disorderly or obstructively during an exam, they may be asked to leave the room immediately. The invigilator must report the event in writing to the head of department at the responsible department.
There will be a special investigation of the event following the exam. Disciplinary measures and management of disciplinary cases are described in section 10.4 Disciplinary measures.
At the beginning of every exam, each student must be given an anonymity code which they must write on every loose paper they intend to submit. If the students were not given anonymity codes when they applied to the take the exam, an invigilator must ensure that all anonymity codes can be found on a code list, which must match each student with a code. The code list is sealed in an envelope and signed by one of the students.
In addition to the code list, there must be a student list – an invigilator must note when each student submits an exam, if they provided identification and the number of papers submitted.
After an exam session ends, both lists (the code list and list with submissions) must be delivered to the responsible department or equivalent in accordance with the instructions for the exam session in question. The code list must then be stored in a safe manner until the results have been decided.
When the results are made public on paper or on the course page, the student codes (not names and/or personal identity numbers) must be published together with the results.
The envelope containing the codes is opened after the results have been made public. When the envelope is opened, a student or someone outside the course management must confirm that the envelope was unopened by signing it.
The responsible department must archive course and exam information in accordance with section 8.8 Reporting results and documentation.
When writing a take-home examination, the student is not monitored and they often do not sit on SLU premises.
Written assignments are projects, etc. carried out by individual students or groups. The purpose of the assignment is to submit a basis for an examination assessment.
Practical examinations
The same rules that apply to written examinations apply to practical examinations (as much as possible). Anonymity codes must be used.
Oral examinations may be recorded to facilitate documentation. In those cases, students must be informed beforehand. It also possible to include several persons during an oral examination – e.g. one takes the exam and another observes.
The student is personally responsible to submit a written assignment or a take-home examination to the examiner before the deadline. Assignments submitted after the deadline do not need to be assessed before the next examination session, but the student is still considered to have used two examination sessions. If special reasons (see section 8.6 Special reasons) or systematic problems cause the student to miss the deadline, the examiner should assess the assignment or examination anyway.
It must be clearly stated if the student is expected to write their assignment or take-home examination alone. The examiner can request that the student orally accounts their individual performance afterwards.
Student answers to a take-home examination must be checked in Urkund (or equivalent). The examiner is responsible for this.
See chapter 9. Independent project (degree project).
Compulsory steps (such as obligations, compulsory attendance, compulsory participation) can apply to placements, laboratory sessions, seminars, excursions or visits to clinics.
Compulsory elements must be justifiable in relation to the intended course learning outcomes.
The course syllabus must state if a course contain compulsory steps, and all requirements to pass the course in question must be clarified no later than when the course starts. See section 7.4 Course start. After that, compulsory steps are normally not allowed to be moved or added to the timetable.
In exceptional cases, compulsory steps can be moved after the course starts, but in those cases students who cannot participate because of the change must be allowed to submit a supplementary assignment during the course period.
A student who has been admitted to and registered on a course is entitled to receive teaching and/or supervision during the course they were admitted to.
Students that cannot participate in a compulsory step due to special reasons (see section 8.6 Special reasons) must be given the opportunity make this up in an appropriate manner – the examiner decides how. If possible, this will occur during the course instance in question, but certain compulsory steps cannot be carried out until the next course instance.
A student who is absent during a compulsory step without giving special reasons cannot expect to be offered a special solution to the problems that may follow.
The possibility to make up compulsory steps may be limited if a course is terminated. See below.
The examiner may decide that a supplementary assignment can replace compulsory steps, if there are reasons for this and if it is possible with regard to the intended learning outcomes and resources of the course. The content and scope of the assignment must correspond to the step it is replacing.
A student’s absence from a compulsory step may mean that they have to take part of the missed step during a future course instance.
In connection with a decision to terminate a course, transitional rules must be established for how compulsory steps may be completed by students who did not pass the course. The scope of these measures depends on how many students are affected and what types of compulsory steps are included.
Students affected by a terminated course must be offered at least one opportunity to fulfil compulsory requirements within two years of the final course instance or the cancellation date, depending on what is most favourable to the student.
When a course is terminated, the same authority that decided the course syllabus or revisions to the course syllabus must also decide the transitional rules. See section 6.2 Course syllabus.
In regard to programme students, the responsible department, in consultation with the programme director of studies, must inform the affected students how they can complete compulsory steps when a course is terminated.
Students who wish for further opportunities to complete compulsory steps must submit a written, justified request. The responsible faculty (belonging to the responsible department) decides whether to offer further opportunities. The decision is made by a person within faculty management responsible for education at first- and second-cycle level, unless the faculty decides something else.
Students who wish to take part of teaching, including compulsory steps, after the first course instance (to which they were registered) has passed, must be re-registered. Re-registration may also be done for a course which is no longer being offered. If a student only wants to retake an exam, they do not need to be re-registered. However, they must apply to take the exam as usual.
Transitional rules must be included in the course syllabus. See section 6.2 Course syllabus. Also see section 8.12 Renewed examination (retake session) limitations.
The education planning and administration handbook often includes the term special reasons. Unless otherwise specified, “special reasons” comprise the following:
Family matters refers to the birth of a child, temporary care of a sick child, and serious illnesses as well as deaths and funerals within the immediate family. Serious illness refers to an illness which requires the student to be present. The student’s immediate family includes the student’s spouse, common law spouse, children and common law spouse’s children.
Extended family matters refers to more serious illness, imminent or occurred deaths, and funerals within the extended family. More serious illness means life-threatening or acute illnesses requiring the student’s presence. The student’s extended family includes the student’s parents, parents-in-law, grandparents, foster parents and siblings. The common law spouse’s parents are regarded as parents-in-law.
Student union commission refers to an assignment as student representative in one of SLU’s, Sluss’ and cooperation bodies.
Public commission refers to a commission (not employment) as lay judge, a commission at a national or municipal authority, or a commission related to general or municipal elections.
If possible, the student should notify the responsible department (course coordinator or equivalent) in advance if they cannot take an exam or take part of a compulsory step because of special reasons.
If necessary, the course coordinator or examiner may request documentation to corroborate the student’s claim regarding a special reason.
After taking an exam, student performance must be assessed as soon as possible.
The basic principle is that a favourable decision may not be changed to a less favourable one for the individual.[1]
The examiner decides on grades – see section 4.5 Examiner – and must provide the examination results:
A student who wishes to have their grade reassessed must submit their request as soon as possible, and include a reason why they want the reassessment. (See the correct form under Links).
Renewed examination during reassessment: see section 8.11 Renewed examination (retake session).
The examiner who decided the grade must also decide any changes to that grade. In exceptional cases, another examiner can be appointed to decide on such a change.
In accordance with the Higher Education Ordinance, only very incorrect decisions must be reassessed. Normally, the issue is not to make a new assessment of an already assessed examination. A reassessment example is when, during a written examination, a student has written their answer to a certain question in the space where another answer is supposed to be, and this has not been acknowledged before.
A course module is a part of a course in the form of credits. It was previously called a module or test in Ladok. A course module can consist of several result notes.
Examination results must be reported in Ladok as soon as possible.
Examination results must be reported in Ladok no later than three weekdays after the requirements have been met. However, during the period 1 July–15 August and 24 December–6 January, the reporting of results may take up to seven weekdays.
The examination date must be included in Ladok. Consequently, it is not the date when the examiner has completed their assessment of the student’s performance and determined the grade that is stated in Ladok.
Failed examination results must also be reported in Ladok. Examination results for courses that are not divided into course modules can only be reported when all examinations have been completed.
Several result notes relating to a course module can be entered in Ladok. See section 6.6 Course modules. When all results have been reported, the course module is listed as passed in Ladok.
There are specific rules for independent projects (degree projects). See chapter 9. Independent project (degree project)..
The grading decision must specify who the examiner was. The decision must also specify any other teachers who participated in the assessment (co-grading teachers).
The responsible department must archive bases for the examination in accordance with Annex 4: Archiving course information.
Example of how to manage failed results in Ladok:
Examination session |
Student performance |
Ladok report |
|
Module |
Course |
||
Examination |
U |
U |
Nothing is reported |
Examination |
Blank examination was submitted |
U |
Nothing is reported |
Examination |
Did not take the exam |
Nothing is reported |
Nothing is reported |
Degree project |
Supplementary assignment required |
Nothing is reported |
Nothing is reported |
Degree project |
Passed, but the grade can be raised if the student submits a supplementary assignment |
G |
G (can be changed if the student submits a supplementary assignment) |
Written assignment |
U |
U |
Nothing is reported |
Examination |
G |
G |
|
Written assignment |
Did not submit anything |
Nothing is reported |
Nothing is reported |
Examination |
G |
G |
|
Written assignment |
Submitted too late |
U* |
Nothing is reported |
Examination |
G |
G |
|
Compulsory step |
Did not participate |
Nothing is reported |
Nothing is reported |
Examination |
G |
G |
|
*If there is a deadline, assignments/take-home examinations submitted after the deadline has passed can count as a used exam session. In those cases, U must be reported in Ladok. Courses with only one module: module grade = grade for the whole course. However, the grade U does not need to be reported in Ladok for the whole course, just the module. |
The responsible department (examiner or course coordinator) running a course should offer students the chance to provide examination feedback.
The student has the right to:
When an examination has concluded, each examination question becomes a public document. Secrecy may be applied to such questions connected to cases listed in the Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act.
A student’s exam answers become official documents when they have been processed. After this process, the answers can be issued back to the student.
A written examination (a student’s answer to examination questions) that does need any more processing may be handed back to the student in question.
If secrecy is an issue when handing back exam answers, the course coordinator must inform students of this through a special decision, following consultation with Legal Affairs.
Before the original exam containing the student’s answers is issued, the student has the right to receive a copy if they request it. This may for example be appropriate if the student wishes to have the examiner’s decision reassessed. The student thereby avoids any suspicion that changes or additions were made to the original after it was handed back. A person can request a copy of the exam, as long as the university is in possession of the answers. The department has the right to charge a copying fee. See section 3.8 Student costs and reimbursements.
The responsible department must decide how examination feedback should be designed. This may occur outside the course period, but before the first retake session. When assessment has concluded, the department is also responsible for issuing the written exams (student answers to an exam) to the students in a controlled manner. For example, the department must ensure that unauthorised persons do not have access to student answers.
The responsible department must offer an alternative examination session to students if anything of the following happens:
Alternative examination sessions must be offered no later than a week after the scheduled examination session, or no later than a week after the discovery that a student’s answers to an exam have gone missing.
The exact time for the alternative examination session must be decided following consultation with the affected student.
There are special rules for compulsory steps. See section 8.5 Compulsory steps.
SLU offers three examination sessions per year:
Renewed examination rules also apply to practical and oral exams, take-home examinations, written assignments or equivalent.
Renewed examination must be offered 10–25 weekdays after the results of the ordinary examination have been announced – i.e. no later than 40 weekdays after the ordinary exam was held. Courses that take place during the latter part of the spring semester (period 4) may schedule retake sessions in August.
Retake sessions connected to specific course instances are only offered if the students in question need to take the exam at that point.
Another retake session must be offered within a year after the course starts, regardless whether students from the latest course instance need it or not.
When an exam is renewed, other students from previous course instances are allowed to participate.
There are special rules for compulsory steps and independent projects (degree projects). See section 8.5 Compulsory steps and chapter 9. Independent project (degree project).
An ongoing examination must be concluded (in the form of grades/results) before the student can take another, renewed, exam.
Students who have requested a reassessment of an exam they failed may take a renewed exam while the reassessment of the first exam takes place, but the renewed exam will not be assessed before the first reassessment is completed.
If the student receives a pass grade following a reassessment, the renewed exam is disregarded. If the student still has a fail grade following reassessment, the renewed exam is assessed.
The responsible department must:
Students must apply for retake sessions at least 10 weekdays before the exam takes place. See section 8.2 Examination times, locations and registration.
Examination sessions count as the number of times a student has taken an exam connected to a specific course or step. An exam which the student has started counts as a spent exam session.
A course module is a part of a course in the form of credits. It was previously called a module or test in Ladok.
Students are given the right to take an exam related to a specific course five times. “If satisfactory completion of a course or part of a course requires successful completion by the student of a placement or corresponding training, the number of prescribed periods of placement or corresponding training shall be at least two.”[1]
The total number of exam sessions and placements may only be limited if not doing so would lead to an unreasonable waste of resources. Any such limitation of the total amount of exam sessions must be specified in the course syllabus.
Exams are geared towards the intended learning outcomes of the course and drawn up in accordance with current reading lists (or equivalent) as well as with current grading criteria, including specified requirements for a pass grade.
An examiner may decide to make an exception for a student who was admitted to an earlier course instance, if there are reasons for it.
If by dividing a course into modules affects the exam, it must primarily take place in accordance with the new division of modules. If this is not possible, the affected students must be offered at least five exam sessions in accordance with the modules that applied when they were admitted to the course.
If a new or revised course syllabus is adopted, the course syllabus in question[2] must also include transitional rules for how exams can be completed by a student who was admitted under a previous course syllabus and did not achieve a pass grade. See section 6.7 Termination of a course.
Examinations should primarily be carried out in accordance with the new course syllabus. However, adjustments may need to be made in order for the objectives in the previous course syllabus to be met.
If a course is terminated, transitional rules must be added to the course syllabus in question. They must state how students who have been admitted but not yet passed the course can complete the course. See section 6.7 Termination of a course.
A general transitional rule is that at least three retake sessions must be offered within two years of the last course instance. In total, students from the latest course instance must be offered at least five retake sessions on a course they have been admitted to.
If there are special reasons, a student may be given the opportunity of another retake session within a terminated course. Accepted reasons are listed in section 8.6 Special reasons, but they can also include longer periods of studies abroad.
Students who wish for another retake session on a course that has been terminated – in addition to what is stated in the transitional rules – must submit a written and justified request to the responsible faculty. The responsible faculty (belonging to the responsible department) decides whether to offer further opportunities. The decision is made by a person within faculty management responsible for education at first- and second-cycle level, unless the faculty decides something else.
See section 8.5 Compulsory steps.
The responsible department must provide information on their course pages regarding the possibility to retake an exam for the following reasons:
If necessary, students must keep up to date with:
When a course is terminated, the responsible faculty must decide whether to offer another exam session – in addition to what is stated in the transitional rules. The responsible faculty (belonging to the responsible department) decides whether to offer further opportunities. The decision is made by a person within faculty management responsible for education at first- and second-cycle level, unless the faculty decides something else.
To the start of the chapter
To the start of the page
9.1 Starting points
9.2 Course syllabus
9.3 Work plan
9.4 Implementation organisation
At SLU, we use the term independent project or degree project. The term Master’s thesis can be used for independent projects (degree projects) of at least 30 credits at second-cycle level. In this chapter, independent project is used. Bachelor’s essays (G2E) are at first-cycle level and Master’s theses (A2E) are at second-cycle level.
As of the autumn semester 2018, the same wording is used in all course syllabuses for independent projects. The intended course learning outcomes for independent projects have been worded in line with the qualification requirements. Independent projects are handled in accordance with the same procedures and responsibilities as other higher education.
Independent projects at first-cycle level can be carried out individually or in pairs. If it is done in pairs, it must be possible to assess individual student efforts.
Independent projects at Master’s level are normally carried out individually. Course coordinators can make exceptions.
The annex to the Ordinance for the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences contains a complete list of all degrees SLU offer.[1] “A requirement for the award of a Higher Education Diploma is completion by the student of an independent project (degree project) within the requirements of the programme.”
All independent projects must follow a course syllabus, just like other courses. See chapter 6. Course syllabus and course instances.
An independent project can only be classified into one main field of study (subject). Double classification is never allowed. See SLU’s examination procedures for a complete list of degrees and main fields of study. Programme syllabuses for programmes that lead to professional qualifications include specific requirements.
At SLU, we use the same wording in all course syllabuses for independent projects.[2] Each programme board can add programme-specific intended learning outcomes, both for professional and general qualifications. However, this must be done restrictively and only if it is vital to add something which is not included in the joint intended learning outcomes. The Board of Education approves any exemptions.
An independent project carried out and assessed at another higher education institution can be transferred and included in an SLU qualification if it meets the objectives and other requirements for the intended qualification.
Joint independent project wording at SLU is included in Slukurs.
All independent projects must be checked for plagiarism (in Urkund) and published within the framework of SLU’s electronic publishing system, Epsilon. The amount of supervision (in hours) must be included under additional information in the course syllabus.
Independent projects are offered at the following level and scope:
Entry requirements for joint independent project wording at SLU are included in Slukurs.
First-cycle level (G2E)
Knowledge equivalent of 120 credits, of which 60 credits within the main field of study. At least one course at specialisation level G2F must be carried out in connection with an independent project. At least one course relevant to the project subject must be carried out before carrying out an independent project.
Second–cycle level (A2E)
Knowledge equivalent of 30 credits at second-cycle level within the main field of study. Independent project with a pass grade at first-cycle level or a Bachelor’s degree. At least one course relevant to the project subject must be carried out before carrying out an independent project. English knowledge corresponding to English 6.
Approved entry requirements exemptions:
General qualifications
Professional qualifications
See chapter 6. Course syllabus and course instances.
The student must write a work plan, following consultation with their supervisor, as soon as possible. This is done to facilitate planning and implementation of the independent project within the given timeframe. The work plan can include the following information:
If a student did not achieve a pass grade, occasional supervision may be offered after the course ends. Regardless of whether the student receives further supervision or not, they are entitled to a renewed final assessment.
The supervisor confirms that the work plan has been written in consultation with the student. The student and course coordinator, who represent SLU, approve the work plan.
If the work plan cannot be followed, the student and supervisor must jointly revise it or write a new one. The supervisor and student must propose the revised work plan and notify the course coordinator. The course coordinator must approve a revised work plan.
Independent projects can be carried out in two ways: with a joint course start, teaching steps and joint conclusion or without. Both alternatives must meet the objectives and requirements in the course syllabus in question. Also see Instructions.
Before the beginning an independent project, students have the right to be clearly informed of what is expected of them and what support is available. This applies to teaching, number of supervision hours, library support and any other resources such as laboratory, computer and workplace access, etc. It cannot be expected that the student carries out other tasks than those connected to an independent project and the intended learning outcomes in the course syllabus.
A student is registered on an independent project course after their registration form (individual or course-date specific) is signed by the course coordinator or the person delegated by the course coordinator. It must also be checked if the student meets the entry requirements.
There must be clear grading criteria for independent projects, just as for other courses. Each programme board decides whether to use the SLU-wide grading criteria for independent projects. In cases where the grading criteria need to be coordinated by several departments within the same course, the programme board can decide on this. The grading criteria will state if it is possible to receive higher than a pass grade (4 and 5).
The deadline specified in the work plan counts as the first exam session, but the work plan may be revised. If there are special reasons (see section 8.6 Special reasons), or other reasons related to the project which are beyond the student’s control, and the revision is done before the original deadline for the project, it must still be possible to receive higher than a pass grade (4 and 5, where applicable).
If the student receives financial remuneration from SLU or externally, this is regulated in a special agreement. Where applicable, this is an agreement between the student and the external partner.
A student has the right to 10 hours of supervision for an independent project of 15 credits, and 20 hours for a project of 30 credits. Supervision can occur individually or in a group. If a student did not receive a pass grade during the course instance period, they can be allowed a few supervision meetings after the period ends.
Examination formats and requirements to pass a course are listed in the course syllabus.
The same examination and grading deadlines that apply to other courses apply to independent projects as well. See chapter 8. Examination (tests) and compulsory steps. In addition, examiners can decide that completion is allowed after the deadline has passed, and that it counts as part of the examination session. Such supplementary work may affect the grade for the independent project, provided it is done before the grading decision has been made.
Independent projects must be reported in Ladok with the original title and the title in English (translation). This means that for projects written in English, only the English title is required. For projects written in Swedish, a translation of the title in English is required.
Independent projects with a pass grade must be published in SLU’s electronic publishing tool, Epsilon.
The SLU library can provide document templates and publishing advice. See Annex 7: What must be included on the front and title page of independent projects (degree projects) at SLU to learn more.
The course coordinator is responsible for ensuring that the administrator receives the final version of the passed project. The administrator uploads projects with a pass grade in Epsilon, and the library reviews bibliographic information before publication.
The supervisor or external partner cannot control the process of making the independent project public since it is in opposition to the Freedom of the Press Act and the Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act. In exceptional cases, publication can be postponed (reading embargo):[1]
In principle, independent projects should be published immediately after receiving a pass grade. In exceptional cases, publication may be delayed for twelve (12) months. The relevant department decides what is best. If there are special reasons, publication can be delayed over 12 months. In such cases, publication is delayed gradually – 6 months at a time – until the purpose for the delay has been resolved. Publication delays over 12 months require a special decision from the faculty in question. The work plan can include possible publication delay.
Changes to independent projects published in Epsilon are only allowed in special cases. Examples: fact or format errors which affect readability, or offences to the law. Supplementary documentation in the form of corrections (an errata page) should be chosen instead of changing the file.
Publications can only be removed from the web (depublication) completely if there are special reasons. Special reasons for depublication can be plagiarism or offences to the law. Annex 8: Depublication process for pdf-files already published in Epsilon contains information on work flow and who does what. Annex 9: Changing a pdf file already published in Epsilon describes how to make changes to an already published file.
The student is responsible for writing a work plan and schedule in consultation with their supervisor. The student carries out their independent project with the aim to meet the intended learning outcomes. The student initiates meetings with their supervisor in accordance with the stipulated supervision hours (10 hours/15 credits or 20 hours/30 credits). A student’s right to supervision only concerns a specific course instance.
The supervisor’s function is to supervise the student to help them meet the intended learning outcomes. The supervisor should inform the student of the available number of supervision hours, help them plan their independent project and co-write their work plan. A supervisor can supervise several students within the same course instance. In certain cases, a student is allowed several supervisors – one must act as the principal supervisor, the others as assistant supervisors. A supervisor can discourage students from submitting the final version of their independent project for defence if it risks receiving a fail grade. However, it is ultimately up to the student to decide what to do.
If necessary, the supervisor must submit bases for assessment to the examiner. If a student did not achieve a pass grade, occasional supervision may be offered after the course ends.
The head of department at the department where the principal supervisor works is responsible for ensuring that there are supervision resources.
The examiner and supervisor cannot be the same person. There may be several examiners in one course instance; however, there may only be one per student project. The examiner assesses and grades a student’s independent project, using the intended course learning outcomes and grading criteria as the starting point. The examiner must make the grading decision without any influence from the supervisor. If necessary, the examiner can require bases for assessment from the supervisor. If several students have written an independent project, the assessment of student performance must be individual. If necessary, the examiner may request that each student provides a report of their individual work on an independent project.
Students who do not receive a pass grade for the course instance in question have the right to be reassessed in the same manner as for other courses.
The course coordinator has a general role and coordinating function at department level, and they approve the work plan. The course coordinator is contacted if, for example, there are cooperation problems or if the student wishes to change subject or supervisor. The course coordinator is also responsible for applying course evaluation procedures on independent projects.
Agreements with external partners are made through separate agreements, and between SLU and the partner in question, not the student (any remuneration exempted). In cases where the student carries out their project externally and has an external supervisor, they must also have a principal supervisor at SLU who is responsible for ensuring that the project is carried out in accordance with SLU guidelines and a course syllabus.
Independent projects can be included in the following:
a) a course with joint beginning, teaching steps and conclusion.
In courses with established course components, supervision can be individual or in a group, as well as scheduled.
b) a course without a joint beginning and teaching steps.
It is very important to write and follow a work plan when students carry out an independent project alone without an established course instance (e.g. within a research project, abroad or with an external client). Other teaching steps may also be included in these independent projects; the work plan states how to carry them out.
It is possible to submit late applications for independent project (degree project) course instances during the whole course period.
As of the autumn semester 2018, all independent projects are digitally archived in Public 360.[2] The published version in Epsilon is downloaded automatically. This means that independent projects published in Epsilon will be preserved. Preservation occurs in accordance with the governing document Strategi för bevarande av elektroniska handlingar (strategy for preserving electronic documents).[3] The responsible department is responsible for archiving and ensuring that independent projects are published in Epsilon, i.e. meet the publication and archiving requirements. The library is responsible for technological solutions.
SLU’s document templates for student works contain the following:
To the start of the chapter
To the start of the page
10.1 Cheating and plagiarism
10.2 Inform and prevent
10.3 Discover and intervene
10.4 Disciplinary measures
Examples of cheating:
In order for something to be considered cheating, it must be misleading, which requires intent. The student in question must have intentionally tried to deceive the teacher.
This requires the following:
Plagiarism is copying another person’s texts or reproducing tables, images and other illustrations without naming the source. Plagiarism is also reproducing a text thoroughly without marking it as a quote, even if the source is stated.
SLU’s objective is to allow students to have an independent and critical approach to knowledge as well as develop general expertise in preparation for their professional careers. One student-activating tool is pedagogy – it develops students’ ability to find, assess and use information in a critical and scientific manner. Both the objective and working method require good knowledge of rules for academic writing.
Both student and teachers require clear guidelines, especially in connection with various forms of examination.
All suspicions of cheating must be followed up with appropriate measures. See section 10.3 Discover and intervene.
During follow-up, the following aspects should be described and analysed:
Disciplinary measures can be invoked against students who use prohibited aids or other methods to attempt to mislead during examinations or other forms of assessment of study performance.[1]
The Swedish Higher Education Authority (UKÄ) divides these measures into the following categories:
Plagiarism is always wrong and can be considered cheating if it is assessed to have been done consciously in order to mislead in the assessment of a study performance.
It must be made clear what the student personally produced and what has been taken (and possibly revised) from other sources. This is done by applying the correct citation and source-using technique. If a person uses another’s text verbatim, this must be done using quotes – which must be framed by quotation marks or otherwise market in a clear manner – and followed by a reference or note. Insufficient reference management can be considered cheating.
A student must also source reference their own material. If a student uses something they have written previously, for example in an essay or other course, they must include a reference to it.
The vice-chancellor is primarily responsible for ensuring that SLU has a long-term prevention plan for cheating and plagiarism.
The Board of Education is responsible for designing the work against cheating and plagiarism. The library, in cooperation with the Educational Development Unit (EPU) are responsible for publishing information on cheating and plagiarism on the SLU web. Programme directors of studies are responsible for spreading this information within their respective programmes.
Everyone working at SLU are obligated to follow the Higher Education Act and Higher Education Ordinance, and to work toward the objectives in the work against cheating and plagiarism. Course coordinators and examiners, especially those responsible for introductory programme courses and independent projects (degree projects) have a great operative responsibility to implement SLU work against cheating and plagiarism.
Students are obligated to carry out examination components honestly in order to enable correct and fair assessment of their study performance.
Information on cheating and plagiarism must be conveyed in various forms to all persons affected. It must be available on relevant SLU webs, e.g. the staff, student and library web. Students and teachers must be made aware of this information at relevant times, e.g. in connection with larger student assignments, written assignments or similar.
Teaching staff should use the following tools to prevent cheating and plagiarism:
Student activities |
Responsibility |
Confirm that they have read the policy and action plan against cheating and plagiarism in connection with collecting their AD-login information during web registration. |
Student |
Publish information on cheating and plagiarism as well as how to reference properly on the SLU web. It must also be possible to use self-instruction study material on cheating and plagiarism. |
The SLU library and the Educational Development Unit (EPU) |
Inform all programme students during their first year on the rules for plagiarism and offer an introduction to academic honesty and references. This applies to courses at both first- and second-cycle level. |
Programme directors of studies with the SLU library |
Ensure that all programme students carry out a written assignment and run it through Urkund during their first academic year. The Urkund results are then discussed with the teacher. |
Course coordinators, programme directors of studies |
Offer specialised teaching on how to write references in combination with research strategies, source criticism and copyright in connection with SLU degree programmes. |
Programme directors of studies with the SLU library |
Offer individual supervision of academic writing through the Centre for Academic Language. |
Library |
Teach academic writing. |
Course coordinator, programme directors of studies with the SLU library |
Provide exchange students and other freestanding students (not studying a programme) information on plagiarism rules for relevant courses. |
Course coordinator |
Teacher activities |
Responsibility |
|
Unit for Educational Development (EPU) |
SLU offers special software for text matching (Urkund) to help discover cheating and plagiarism.
All independent projects (degree projects) at SLU must be checked for plagiarism in Urkund before receiving a pass grade. See chapter 9. Independent project (degree project)..
Any work submitted by students at SLU may be sent through Urkund for review.
If there is reason to suspect cheating or plagiarism, the head of department at the responsible department must report this to the vice-chancellor as soon as possible. The student’s conditions and the specific course requirements and prerequisites must be taken into consideration. See section 10.4 Disciplinary measures and Riktlinjer vid misstanke om fusk och andra disciplinära frågor inom utbildning vid SLU (guidelines for suspicion of cheating and other disciplinary issues relating to education at SLU – only in Swedish).
The examiner is responsible for ensuring that student assignments are sent to Urkund, but operative implementation normally occurs when the student delivers material to their supervisor.
If there is reason to suspect cheating, the head of department at the responsible department must report this to the vice-chancellor as soon as possible, and keep the following things in mind:
Section 10.1 Cheating and plagiarism states what is considered cheating and when it can lead to disciplinary measures.
Teaching, examinations or other activities relating to education may not be disturbed. See section 3.2 Teaching environments.
The SLU equal opportunities plan states that there is zero tolerance for discrimination, harassment and other victimisation at SLU. This includes both students and employees.
“Disciplinary measures may be invoked against students who:
“Disciplinary measures may not be invoked more than two years after the offence has been committed.”[2]
“If there are grounds for suspecting that an offence of the kind laid down in Section 1 has been committed, the vice-chancellor shall be notified promptly.”[3]
The head of department at the responsible department reports the matter to the vice-chancellor. Thereafter, the vice-chancellor determines whether the matter will be referred to the disciplinary board at SLU for a hearing. The disciplinary board decides on the consequences after investigating the matter and interviewing the student.
When a student has been reported on the suspicion of cheating, they will not receive any grades before the matter has been decided by the vice-chancellor or disciplinary board. However, the student can participate in other examinations during the investigation period.
An examiner can fail a student even though cheating has not been proven, but they are not allowed to appeal the vice-chancellor’s assessment of the situation. Example: A student is suspected of cheating when caught with a cheat sheet before an exam. The student is subject to disciplinary consequences since there was intent to mislead. However, the student did not actually use their sheet – therefore, the offence must not affect the assessment of the exam they subsequently carried out.
The disciplinary measures for cheating are a warning or suspension for a maximum of six months. When suspended, a student cannot participate in examinations, lectures or other activities within the framework of their studies. In addition, they are not allowed to use university resources such as the library or IT services.
If there are scheduled exams during the suspension period, the student must wait until the next renewed examination session after the period ends.
To the start of the chapter
To the start of the page
11.1 Degree programme objectives and requirements at SLU
11.2 Dimension degree programmes
11.3 Propose a new degree programme
11.4 Principles for naming a degree programme
11.5 Joint programmes and degrees
11.6 Phase out a degree programme
All degree programmes at SLU must be connected to the university’s mission statement and areas, in accordance with government assignments. Degree programmes should complement each other and, if necessary, be available on several campuses. Doubling courses and programmes at existing SLU sites may occur if there is:
In addition, SLU courses and programmes must relate to the national range of courses and programmes offered. Many of SLU’s areas of expertise compete with other universities and higher education institutions.
The annex to the Ordinance for the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences contains a complete list of all qualifications SLU offers.[1] There are two types of qualifications at SLU: professional and general. SLU may decide the qualification specialisations. General qualification specialisations are decided by the main field of study which offers progressive specialisation within the programme. See section 2.5 Subject, main field of study, disciplinary domain.
Specific requirements for certain types of programmes:
All SLU courses and programmes must be in demand by the students. Describing and assessing potential student interest is challenging. Student interest applies to both educational content and implementation. A clear educational structure is necessary to communicate SLU’s range of courses and programmes to prospective students. Special attention should be given to programme titles, and preparation must include some form of external perspective.
Students currently studying at SLU have important experiences which should be utilised in the development process. It also important that the university provides current students with clear information on transitional rules and other practical details.
All degree programmes at SLU should correspond to the needs of the labour market and society in general. SLU students must be prepared for a long professional life on a global labour market.
All degree programmes at SLU must have high teaching expertise. SLU’s degree programme range must be based on and advance teaching expertise at the departments (equivalent). This applies to scientific, artistic, educational and supervision expertise. Professional programmes must also include teachers’ professional expertise.
An advertised programme must be financially durable in accordance with the approved reimbursement model.
The physical and social study environment must enable students to benefit from teaching.
All degree programme at SLU must be designed to provide students with conditions to meet the qualitative targets. There must be a progression between various educational levels: “Second-cycle courses and study programmes shall involve the acquisition of specialist knowledge, competence and skills in relation to first-cycle courses and study programmes...”[2]
SLU courses and programmes must focus on student learning. They must have good links to research and society. Sustainable development, gender equality and international perspectives must be integrated in all courses and programmes.
Joint studies of different programmes may have educational and financial advantages, e.g. that students with varying experiences from several different programmes can enrich teaching of a specific course.
All programmes should have a well thought-out concept for collaboration with the sector or businesses targeted by the programme, and discuss how cooperation benefits both the course/programme and students. All degree programmes beginning at first-cycle level should include at least 15 credits (10 weeks) of placement, study trips or activities carried out somewhere other than the campus, or in cooperation with an external party. See chapter 15. External collaboration.
All degree programmes should include the possibility of exchange studies for a whole semester. Long professional programmes (5 years) must offer exchange studies (exception: qualifications that include certificates).
Specific requirements for certain types of programmes:
Within the framework of SLU’s quality assurance procedures, follow-up of objectives and requirements is done within individual courses and programmes.
Educational dimensioning is primarily controlled by the following factors:
The range of courses and programmes offered must correspond to student demand and the needs of the labour market.[2]
SLU must report the assessments, prioritisations and needs analyses that are the basis for all course and programme range decisions.[3] SLU adjustments in regard to e.g. to allocation between programmes and courses at various levels and different entry requirements, as well as the division of campus and distance learning must be reported. In addition, a report must be made on how SLU meets the surrounding society’s need for education.
Educational dimensions are decided in several steps:[4]
Annex 2: Annual cycle for course and programme planning lists, among other things, joint timeframes for planning and decisions on dimensioning degree programmes.
A new degree programme is a big commitment for SLU and a great responsibility, especially for the first programme students. Therefore, great care is required to analyse the conditions for and plan new programmes. Good planning is necessary when preparing and deciding on changes to the range of programmes offered. See Annex 2: Annual cycle for course and programme planning.
A new degree programme must meet the requirements in section 12.1 Degree programme objectives and requirements at SLU. New programme proposals must describe, analyse and assess the aspects below as bases for a decision to create a new programme.
The items below can be used as support when developing new programmes, and for decision-making. The proposal must describe the aspects concisely, and the scope of various parts may vary depending on specific needs and prerequisites. A preliminary programme syllabus must exist when establishing a new programme.
SLU may be jointly responsible for a programme with other higher education institutions, and create joint examinations. There are specific guidelines for joint programmes and joint degrees, which state the exceptions and agreements required in such cases. See Links below.
Matrix model: A matrix is made for each programme, displaying how qualitative targets will be met through the planned programme courses. The matrix includes the qualitative targets on one axis and included courses on the other axis. The interface lists relevant intended course learning outcomes that contribute to meeting the qualitative targets in question. The model clarifies how a programme is designed and how it will progress in a clear way, and must take both subject-specific and general skills into consideration.
Programme |
Degree outcome 1 |
Degree outcome 2 |
Degree outcome 3, etc. |
Course code: |
|
Intended learning outcome 1 + 3 |
|
Course code: |
Intended learning outcome 3 |
|
Intended learning outcome 2 |
Course code: |
Intended learning outcome 4 |
Intended learning outcome 1 + 6 |
|
Course code: |
|
|
Intended learning outcome 5, etc. |
Activity |
Degree programme |
Proposal |
Department, programme board or faculty board |
Approve/reject |
Programme board, faculty board and Board of Education[3] |
Decision to set up |
SLU Board[4] |
Decision on programme syllabus |
Board of Education[5] |
Annex 2: Annual cycle for course and programme planning includes, among other things, joint timeframes for planning and decisions on range of programmes and courses offered. Changes to the range of programmes and courses offered should be prepared in parallel at faculty and university level. When developing a new programme, relevant programme syllabus information is compiled during various preparation phases. This means that a programme syllabus can be established in connection with the SLU Board’s decision to implement a new programme.
An important detail for SLU as a university is clarity regarding what our courses and programmes involve. The most important thing is to highlight what subject expertise each course/programme provides, but also, in some cases, which profession the course/programme can lead to.
In order for the university to meet the SLU strategy objectives and in accordance with the public service agreement, the naming of SLU degree programmes is one of the most basic success factors from both a clarity and recruitment perspective.
At SLU, the naming principles below apply to new programmes or when changing the name of an already established programme.
In short, the following process applies when naming new or renaming previous programme titles:
It is important that programme titles are uniform. However, to avoid ponderous formulations in text, the following approach is recommended for official documents:
It is important to use the full official name for SLU when discussing the university in educational contexts, primarily when other systems gather data from SLU’s course and programme database or from Ladok. The following two names are official and registered:
Note that these sites are e.g. antagning.se, studera.nu and universityadmissions.se – proven important tools when selecting a course or programme.
The Higher Education Act allows Swedish universities and higher education institutions to issue joint degrees together with foreign or other Swedish higher education institutions[1]. Joint degrees mean “a qualification that may be awarded by the higher education institutions that have jointly organised courses and programmes that can lead to the award of the qualification[2].” Therefore, it is not a question of a special degree category, but about the possibility for two or more higher education institutions to arrange and implement a joint course or programme that results in a joint degree of the same kind that they generally have the right to issue individually.
Despite trying to develop criteria for what the concept of a joint degree means within the framework of European cooperation, there is still no conclusive definition. However, definitions from various countries have the following in common[3]:
The difference between a joint degree and a double degree is not completely clear, either. The former National Agency for Higher Education[4] defined joint and double degrees in the following way:
Joint degree: Degree awarded by at least two higher education institutions, domestic or foreign. The programmes must have been jointly arranged, and both higher education institutions must have the right to issue degrees in accordance with the country in question’s legislature.
Double degree: Two degrees based on one and the same higher education programme[5].
In order to justify the development of a joint degree programme, the programme should be better through cooperation than if each higher education institution arranged the programme on its own. Therefore, the collaboration should be built on each partner’s special strengths. In order to ensure that all SLU education is of high quality, there should be high requirements on any potential partners. As much as possible, equal and well “well-tried” institutions should be discussed, and the collaboration should be built on each partner’s strength.
Therefore, it is important to establish close cooperation with selected higher education institutions that have relevant subject expertise and reliable quality assurance systems. Examples of these institutions can be found in the NOVA and ELLS networks, but collaboration agreements can be made with other high-quality institutions, following the vice-chancellor’s approval.
The purpose of joint degree programmes that lead to joint degrees is to make possible collaboration profits that favour the students and higher education institutions, and to increase internationalisation by making it easier for students to study at several higher education institutions within the framework of their education. Since it is clear from the beginning which courses students can take at different higher education institutions, they can transfer the credits from all passed degree course without special assessment.
When developing a joint degree programme, higher education institutions should keep students’ legal security in mind; they should have the same rights and obligations as students admitted to the institutions in question. Therefore, it is important, in the written agreement, to clearly and definitely regulate anything that affect students’ possibilities to complete their studies.
According to the Higher Education Ordinance, SLU may only issue joint degree if:
Issuing a joint degree based on a joint programme is a complex process because it requires established compatibility between at least two different higher education institutions. It becomes especially complicated when institutions cooperate internationally because education systems and legislation from at least two countries must come together and be followed. Therefore, the Swedish Riksdag and Government have decided that the Higher Education Act and Higher Education Ordinance must regulate which criteria must be met in order for Swedish higher education institutions to issue joint degrees.
In addition to the national rules, SLU has developed further requirements to the written agreement that is the base of an educational collaboration which purpose is to issue a joint degree. Apart from these basic requirements, it is important to be flexible in relation to SLU’s “regular rules” in order to even make this kind of educational collaboration possible.
Those who plan to collaborate in order to issue a joint degree must, before the collaboration begins, ensure that items A–D above are met.
A general prerequisite in order to issue joint degrees is that they must relate to a joint programme, i.e. a degree programme developed and implemented together by the higher education institutions in question. From an SLU perspective, it is important to be thorough during the planning phase in order to ensure that all the joint programmes meet all requirements regarding Swedish degrees. Consequently, foreign higher education institutions part of this collaboration must ensure that all requirements for the corresponding programme in their country are met. All parts of the programme must be arranged by the participating institutions – different institutions arrange different components. However, the higher education institutions must establish the content beforehand. This means that the student only needs to apply for a credit transfer for any courses they have passed at a higher education institutions outside of the collaboration in question. Legally, every institution is responsible for their part of the degree programme: steps implemented at SLU must follow the Swedish Higher Education Act and Higher Education Ordinance. The other steps must follow regulations established by higher education institutions in question.
In order to redesign an already existing programme into a new programme with a joint degree, the participating institutions (see below) must develop a (new) written agreement. Additionally, the information regarding joint education and joint degrees must be entered into the programme syllabus.
Just like for all new degree programmes, it is important to discuss and establish all plans with the department and programme board in question, and subsequently the deputy vice-chancellor (equivalent), who may initiate a discussion with the Board of Education regarding the programme content and place in SLU’s programme offering. Among other things, Annex 2: Annual cycle for course and programme planning, lists joint planning and programme offering decision timeframes.
The Board of Education must approve new joint degree programmes that will result in a joint degree, and be established by the SLU Board, which decides on the programme offering.
In accordance with SLU’s implementation of the Higher Education Ordinance requirements, the following must be included in the written agreement[6]:
1. “every component of the programme is arranged by one of the higher education institutions party to the educational cooperation”;
It should be made clear which courses are included in the joint degree without special review and where they are taught.
2. “which component of the programme the higher education institution shall organise, […] which component of the programme another higher education institution shall organise”;
However, the higher education institutions in question must decide on the different components together.
3. “the components of the programme arranged by an institution other than the higher education institution itself shall also be based on an academic or artistic footing and on proven experience and shall be organised so that the programme maintains a high standard”;
The quality of all components must have high international standard.
4. “to which higher education institution or institutions organising components of the programme an applicant to the programme is to be admitted”;
The agreement must make it clear which higher education institution is responsible for programme admission, for example the institution that is responsible for the first component.
It is very important that the entry requirements are thoroughly based on programme syllabuses and course syllabuses. The programme entry requirements must be coordinated with the entry requirements for the included courses, including the linguistic requirements.
In cases where SLU is responsible for admission, the rules from the Ordinance for SLU and SLU’s admission regulations apply. If another institution manages admission, their rules apply.
5. “that the higher education institution may admit applicants only to the component of the programme arranged by the higher education institution”;
SLU can admit students to the programme in question because all collaborating higher education institutions are jointly arranging the programme, but SLU can only admit students to courses held by the university.
6. “when a student who has been admitted to a component of the programme by another higher education institution shall be considered to be a student pursuant to Section 11c”;
A student who has been admitted to a joint programme that results in a joint degree must be considered a programme student at SLU during their whole study period, regardless of where they conduct their studies.
7. “that students shall be able to transfer credits for a successfully completed component of a programme at another higher education institution to the programme at the higher education institution without special review”;
Within the framework of the joint programme, approved components from participating higher education institutions must be transferred to the student at SLU without special review. Therefore, it is important to be very clear regarding which courses are included in the collaboration and where they are taught (also see item 1 above).
8. “what qualification the programme can lead to at each of the higher education institutions, and”;
In order to ensure fair legal circumstances for the student, it is important to make a great effort to develop correct degree titles at the different institutions. (However, a joint degree is one degree that two (or more) higher education institutions issue.) Also see item 13 below.
9. “other conditions required for the organisation of the programme”;
In addition to the above, the written agreement must ensure that SLU’s quality assurance requirements are met. Therefore, the agreement must also state the following:
10. How an independent and continuous education quality control will be carried out at each participating higher education institution.
SLU’s quality assurance work within first- and second-cycle level is described in Chapter 5. Quality assurance.
11. Development and student influence
The agreement must clarify how the programme can develop over time, how student influence can be catered to and how joint possible changes will be decided and documented.
12. Funding and fee management
The agreement must ensure the students’ right to a degree, without SLU having to take funding responsibility for parts of the programme which other higher education institutions are responsible for. Therefore, it is necessary to ensure that there are secure funding sources for the whole programme, and also that the agreement regulates how funding responsibility is divided between institutions. Students in a joint degree programme must pay tuition fees in accordance with Swedish legislation. In other words, students not from the EU, EEA states or Switzerland must pay a fee that covers the full cost for the components they study at SLU, except when their studies are conducted within the framework of an Erasmus Mundus programme. In those cases, the fee may not surpass the maximum tuition fee amount established by the EU[7]. Therefore, the agreement must establish rules regarding such tuition fees, including what applies to paying students who do not pass their courses within the “regular” period. SLU’s viewpoint is that examination outside a programme’s “regular” period should not include any extra costs.
13. Agreement regarding which laws from the countries involved will apply in the following contexts:
a) The programme as a whole. For example, it will be connected to the higher education institution mainly responsible for admission.
In regard to higher education institutions which must follow the Higher Education Act, the information above means that a certain higher education institution’s decision regarding e.g. suspension only concerns the component arranged by the institution in question. If a student – or a person considered a student – is to be suspended from other components as well, this must occur in accordance with the current regulations at the institution responsible for that component. If two higher education institutions that must follow the Higher Education Act arrange programme components, and the student is to be suspended from both components, the disciplinary board at each institution must decide on suspension in relation to their component[8].
b) Each component (course). The responsible institution’s regulations regarding e.g. examination must be followed during the component in question. In other words, SLU regulations must be followed in courses arranged by SLU.
Independent project (degree project) regulations need to be considered, especially if students are to be able to carry out this work at two or more higher education institutions included in the collaboration in question. In these cases, the division of labour between partners must be made clear.
c) Furthermore, the agreement should state that the institution’s rules always apply before the agreement rules (in case of conflict during a component).
14. Clear rules for what is required in order to receive a pass grade in each programme component as well as meet the qualification requirements.
In order to ensure, as much as possible, that each student will receive a joint degree, it is important to be very clear what is required to receive a pass grade in each component.
At SLU, the programme syllabus lists qualification requirements, and the course syllabus lists all course requirements. Therefore, always refer as much as possible to the written agreement in a programme syllabus proposal (as an annex).
15. Responsibility for transfer of credits awarded between higher education institutions
All SLU students must be registered in the study documentation system Ladok, including in cases where programme admission is managed by another university than SLU.
Higher education institutions must develop a procedure for information concerning credits awarded between institutions. The agreement must always make clear if the institution or students are responsible for such information.
16. Degree and degree certification
The degree requirements in the Ordinance for SLU must be met in order for SLU to issue a joint degree. For other participating institutions, their national regulations apply respectively.
A joint degree certificate can be designed freely as long as it meets the Higher Education Ordinance requirements for content, and SLU’s visibility requirements[9]. A degree certificate is issued in the form of a joint document, in which SLU must be visible in accordance with the written agreement.
A diploma supplement, which describes the programme and its place in the education system must be attached to the degree certificate. The supplement should follow the model jointly developed by the European Commission, etc., and be issued automatically and without charge to all students.
In order to ensure that the requirements above are met, the written agreement should regulate the degree certificate and annex design and content, and also state which higher education institutions will handle any degree issues. When a degree is issued, it is marked in Ladok as a joint degree.
17. Responsibility for communication, student service and study guidance
It must be made clear which party is responsible for communicating information to the students, both before and during the programme. It is also important to list contact persons at participating institutions, who is responsible for housing issues as well as which institution students can turn to in case of complaints.
18. What happens when/if an agreement comes to an end
The agreement should contain phase-out rules that give the students enough time to complete their studies. The length of the phase-out period should correspond to what is considered normal in relation to the higher education institutions’ own courses and programmes. The rules should also include aspects such as legal consequences in relation to e.g. copyright of established material.
19. New programme criteria
The general aspects and criteria that apply when creating a new degree programme at SLU in accordance with 11.3 Propose a new degree programme also apply to joint degree programmes arranged by one or several other higher education institutions.
20. Degree programme details
In order to avoid ambiguity, it is important that the written agreement also regulates collaboration requirements at a more detailed level. If possible, refer to the degree syllabus proposal information described in section 12.1 Programme syllabus. Among other things, it includes programme objectives and content, teaching language, entry requirements (including language requirements) and other important programme information.
It is important that joint degree programme plans are well-established at department and faculty level from the beginning. The reason for this is that academic and administrative resources, to a larger or smaller extent, are normally used as soon as the programme begins, and funding must be ensured.
To make the process easier and avoid misunderstandings, a letter of intent must be created as soon as possible. The vice-chancellor must sign this letter. In order for the work to run as smoothly as possible, the workflow stated in annex X must be followed. It is important that staff who work with admission, agreement and degree issues, primarily at the Division of Educational Affairs. Also, staff at the Legal Affairs Unit must always be consulted during the planning phase.
When applying for joint programme funding from various EU programmes, e.g. Erasmus Mundus, the application – from SLU’s perspective – can be submitted to the EU Commission following consultation with the deputy vice-chancellor (equivalent). The vice-chancellor’s signed letter of intent must also be enclosed. Only when SLU is a full partner in the EU programme can the collaboration in question can lead to a joint degree. In cases where SLU is an associated partner, the collaboration can instead lead to a double degree.
Someone who plans/wishes to request collaboration with another higher education institution that will result in a joint degree must talk to their head of department and programme board chair in question early, and subsequently the deputy vice-chancellor. After that, the vice-chancellor must sign a letter of intent (see below). A justification regarding the choice of collaboration partner(s) must be attached to the letter as well. It must also include an evaluation of the potential partner based on the following criteria:
In order to create good conditions for smooth collaboration, the following matters should be taken into consideration early in the planning phase:
Degree programmes which no longer meet labour market needs, do not attract enough students or do not meet quality requirements must either be developed or phased out. Before deciding whether to phase out (terminate) a programme, the programme board must draw up measures which enable students who have already been admitted to complete their studies.
If a degree programme gets a new programme syllabus and a new programme code, it is decided that the previous programme syllabus will be phased out in accordance with applicable parts of the regulations concerning the phase-out of a programme.
Established programme syllabuses are legally binding, and a higher education institution is obligated to follow them. A student who has been admitted and subsequently registered in a programme has long-term rights when it comes to the possibility to complete their studies.
Transitional rules must be approved in connection with the decision to phase out a degree programme. See section 6.2 Course syllabus. The rules must be documented in the repealed programme syllabus. See section 12.1 Programme syllabus[10].
A decision to phase out a degree programme (with programme code), means that the programme syllabus stops applying, but only after the student involved have had the chance to complete their studies within the regular study period. The responsible programme board can decide on a longer phase-out period. The decision to phase out a programme must include from which academic year the programme will no longer be part of SLU’s programme offering.
The university’s obligation to arrange course instances for the programme courses in question, which is listed in the programme syllabus, will no longer apply after a programme has been phased out. However, phasing out a degree programme does not mean that the included courses are automatically terminated – see section 6.7 Termination of a course. The programme board in question decides if a course will be terminated, and this is handled in a separate document. It can be done successively in connection with deciding on course instances for the coming academic year. See section 6.4 Course instance.
Sections 6.7 Termination of a course, 8.5 Compulsory steps and 8.12 Renewed examination (retake session) limitations describe the possibilities of completing courses that have already been started. Additionally, someone who has been admitted to and registered in a programme at SLU has the right to apply to have their credits transferred and apply for a degree. This is still possible even after the programme syllabus in question does no longer apply[11].
A degree programme that has had a freeze on admissions for five consecutive years must be phased out.
When deciding to phase out a programme or a freeze on admissions, educational quality for already admitted students must be ensured, and transitional rules must be established.
Following a decision to phase out a programme, there may be no new admissions to year 1. However, admission to higher years is allowed as long as the schedule follows the programme schedule.
There must be a plan regarding how to communicate the changes to the students in question. Affected students must be notified regardless if it concerns termination or freeze on admissions.
The responsible programme board must report measures that enable already admitted students to complete their studies. The programme board’s responsibility applies to normal study rates. Additionally, the following must be taken into consideration: students who have taken leave from their studies with guaranteed places as well as students with disabilities, who may have the right to have their study rate adapted.
Division of responsibility is the same as when a programme is created. See section 11.3 Propose a new degree programme. The faculty office supporting the responsible programme board is responsible for informing affected students according to the instructions below.
The decision document concerning the phase-out of a degree programme (with a programme code), must include the following:
A decision to phase out a degree programme (with a programme code) must include the reason(s) for why it is being phased out. The following must be added to the programme syllabus in question:
Students must be given information in writing. Contact must occur through letters and subsequently be documented. The information must also be posted on the programme page in question on the student web. The following must be included:
If it is impossible to offer programme syllabus courses to students who return from approved leave from studies or students with approved study paces, they must either be offered an individual study plan or other solution to receive the programme degree in question.
“Affected students” include the following:
Study advisors can help other students, e.g. students with longer periods of approved leave from studies without special reasons. They can be given individual study planning in order to complete their degrees.
Annex 2: Annual cycle for course and programme planning includes, among other things, joint timeframes for planning and decisions on range of programmes and courses offered, including the termination of a programme. Changes to the range of programmes and courses offered should be prepared in parallel at faculty and university level.
When it has been decided to repeal a programme syllabus (with a programme code), the following applies:
No more new students may be registered in the programme after the final programme instance. However, there may be admission to the programme as long as courses are held in accordance with the programme schedule.
To the start of the chapter
To the start of the page
12.1 Programme syllabus
12.2 Programme instance
12.3 Temporary freeze on admissions
The Higher Education Ordinance contains course and programme regulations:[1]
SLU follows the recommendations for programme syllabuses issued by SUHF (the Association of Swedish Higher Education):[2]
Programme syllabuses must state:
The following applies to programme syllabuses for degree programmes at first-cycle and second-cycle level at SLU:
Programme syllabus for the xx programme, xx credits
(Syllabus for the xxx Programme, xx credits)
The headings “Content and structure”, “Transitional provisions and other regulations” as well as “Other information” may be revised by the programme board in question, if the task has been delegated by the Board of Education.
Annex 2: Annual cycle for course and programme planning includes, among other things, joint timeframes for planning and decisions on programme syllabuses. Also see the instructions for programme syllabuses under Links for more information.
See section 11.4 Principles for naming a degree programme.
The faculty office or other unit that support the body that decides on the programme syllabus in question is responsible for submitting the approved syllabus for archiving.
A programme instance is a programme period and start date.
Potential students must be provided with information in good time. Therefore, both the programme syllabus and programme instance must be decided in good time before the application period begins.
A decision of which degree programme will be available for the coming academic year must be made by 1 July.
The SLU Board annually decides on the range of degree programmes offered at first- and second-cycle level.[1]
Annex 2: Annual cycle for course and programme planning includes, among other things, joint timeframes for planning and decisions on range of programmes and courses offered.
Degree programmes on the SLU web:
Any changes to the announced programme offering must be done before admission is carried out for the subsequent semester. Currently, decisions regarding the termination of a programme must be made not later than:
A degree programme that has had freeze on admissions for five consecutive years must be phased out. See section 11.6 Phase out a degree programme.
The vice-chancellor decides whether to terminate an announced degree programme.[1]
To the start of the chapter
To the start of the page
13.1 Programme application (programme instance)
13.2 Programme admission (programme instance)
13.3 Programme registration (programme instance)
13.4 Admission to latter parts of programmes
13.5 Approved leave from studies and non-completion of a programme
13.6 Changes to the range of courses offered within a programme
13.7 Programme director of studies
“A person seeking admission to first or second-cycle higher education shall apply within the time prescribed and in compliance with the procedures laid down by the higher education institution.”[1]
The Swedish Agency for Higher Education Services (UHR) coordinates higher education applications in Sweden. The application deadline for each semester can be found at www.antagning.se and www.universityadmissions.se.
Applications can be made at:
“Any specific entry requirements imposed shall be totally essential for a student to be able to benefit from the course or study programme.”[1]
“If special grounds exist, a higher education institution may decide to waive one or more entry requirements. A higher education institution shall waive one or more entry requirements if the applicant has the capacity to benefit from the course or study programme without meeting the entry requirements.”[2]
Antagningsordning för tillträde till utbildning på grundnivå och avancerad nivå (admission regulations for first- and second-cycle education – only in Swedish) regulate access to courses and programmes at first- and second-cycle level.
The applicant receives an email saying that their admission decision is available under “My Pages” at www.antagning.se.
If the applicant must reply to the admission decision, the decision must include:
An applicant who has been admitted to a programme and accepted their place, but who does not intend to take the programme, must decline as soon as possible under “My pages” at www.antagning.se.
Under “My pages” at www.antagning.se, a student can see if they are on the waiting list. After receiving an offer to study the programme, the student must reply within 24 hours.
The student must:
The head of admissions decides on[3]:
SLU follows the guidelines applied by the Swedish Agency for Higher Education Services’ (UHR) regarding application and admission, as well as the Association of Swedish Higher Education’s (SUHF) recommendations within the field.
By registering, the student confirms that they accept their place on the course.
Students can register themselves on a programme by registering to take the introductory programme course. They must be present at the roll-call (equivalent), and are subsequently registered in the first programme course.
Lost programme place
A student who does not attend when the programme starts may lose their place, unless they have notified the Division of Educational Affairs beforehand stating why they cannot attend. Special reasons are defined in more detail in section 8.6 Special reasons.
A student can begin studying a programme after it has begun if they still have a place. However, this must occur no later than two (2) weeks after the programme starts. Shorter time periods apply to certain programmes.
The head of admissions, in consultation with the programme director of studies in question, decides:
SLU allows admission to the latter part of programmes. The programme board decides on exemptions for specific programmes.
A student can be admitted to latter parts of degree programmes before the second semester at the earliest, provided there is space.
Applications must be for a specific semester and year. The applicant’s previous studies govern which programme semester they are admitted to.
SLU’s admission regulations govern requirements.
The number of available places per year is established by the programme board in question before every application period.
In accordance with SLU’s admission regulations, the programme board in question can decide on more detailed ranking and selection guidelines.
If a student has been rejected for a latter part of a programme because there are no available places, they cannot appeal.
A decision stating that an applicant does not meet the entry requirements can be appealed.
The responsible programme board decides on admission to latter parts of a programme.[1] This decision may be delegated.
There is more information on how admission to latter parts takes place on the student web (see link below). The applicant must use a special application form which is then submitted to the registrar in question.
SLU announces a period in which prospective students can submit applications before each autumn and spring semester, respectively.
The body which decides on these matters must also archive:
See section 3.13 Approved leave from studies and non-completion.
The range of courses offered within a programme is revised over time, but the programme board in question is responsible for giving students the possibility to complete their studies in accordance with the programme syllabus objectives in question. Changes to the range of courses offered within a programme are announced in the form of a revised programme syllabus. See section 12.1 Programme syllabus.
Certain changes can be added directly to a programme syllabus. Other changes to a degree programme require gradual adjustment regarding already admitted programme students. See the instructions for programme syllabuses under Links for more information.
The programme board is responsible for students who study a programme at a normal pace of study. In addition, students who have taken approved leave from studies with a guaranteed place, and students with disabilities who may have the right to an adapted course of study, must be taken into consideration.
For more information on the phasing out of a degree programme. see section, 11.6 Phase out a degree programme.
Programme directors of studies have a general responsibility for one or several degree programmes. The tasks of programme directors of studies are defined in the vice-chancellor’s delegation of authority. See Delegations of authority.
The responsible programme board appoints programme directors of studies for degree programmes.[1]
Contact information for programme directors of studies must be available in connection with the programme descriptions on the SLU web. The faculty office supporting the programme director of studies in question is responsible for making contact information available.
Contact information for programme directors of studies can be found on the student web programme pages:
To the start of the chapter
To the start of the page
See Tillgodoräknandeordning för utbildning på grund- och avancerad nivå (credit transfer procedures for first-cycle and second-cycle education).
15.1 External collaboration
15.2 External collaboration purpose and objectives
15.3 Education planning – external collaboration
15.4 External collaboration and student progression
15.5 External collaboration for good working life connections (teachers)
15.6 Follow-up
External collaboration is a means or a process that requires two or more parties to achieve a common goal that it would not have been possible for them to achieve on their own. SLU’s external collaboration partners can be national or international. Systemic educational collaboration activities should be planned focusing on joint objectives and both parties’ conditions.
The programme boards are generally responsible for educational collaboration, and it can be planned in the following way:
The responsible programme board must state the students’ intended learning outcomes, educational quality objectives and other collaboration objectives.
The degree programme’s external collaboration objectives should be listed. How does collaboration benefit the programme? Does it focus on student employability and day-one skills, and/or educational quality in general? According to programme and business representatives, which expertise and skills are completely necessary for students to learn?
SLU’s external collaboration partners should be given a real opportunity to take part of educational planning.
Collaborating with working life representatives when planning a programme, course or teaching can contribute to better preparing students for their future working lives. It can also give future employers an insight into the education process and possible parts of research. To reduce dependence on personal contacts, business clusters, alumni and industry organisations can be used, as well as organised systematic collaboration (e.g. programme board or industry council participation) (equivalent).
When a course or a programme is revised, external reference groups should be given the opportunity to provide viewpoints. External viewpoints must also be included when deciding on the dimension of a course or programme.
External collaboration activities and their intended learning outcomes must gradually become more complex for students on a course or programme. Professional contacts must be made available to students even if they decide not to take an optional placement course.
External collaboration can be organised into individual courses such as placement or project courses, seminar series or course components. Courses should be divided into appropriate years. In addition, external collaboration objectives and content should be listed in course syllabuses.
External collaboration progression can mean introducing professional contacts early during a course or programme and subsequently deepening and integrating them in teaching activities. Ultimately, a student can then use their learned skills and knowledge at a company, within an organisation, public authority or in a similar, realistic context. Higher progression may mean increased student activity requirements and more actively involved students. An example of a model with an increased complexity degree involves study visits, guest lectures, cases/assignments and more “concentrated” external collaboration projects.
The choice of components and collaborations forms should be governed and justified based on the intended learning outcomes and conditions of the specific course or programme and industry that it specialises in.
External collaboration activities should complement the students’ unions’ business and labour market days or mentor programmes.
Through collaboration, teachers should be given the opportunity to stay updated about relationships and conditions for an external working life.
Working life involves many changes, and it can be difficult for teachers to have current knowledge of which skills are in demand in the private sector. In order for courses and programmes to be relevant to society and current, various forms of external collaboration can make e.g. teacher study visits, teacher exchange, adjunct teachers, externally employed senior lectureships, etc. possible, which can contribute to connect teaching to the current labour market.
Follow-up of the external collaboration objectives must be done from the course or programme’s, students’ and external partners’ perspective.
The university is responsible for maintaining good teaching quality from a student perspective. Collaboration activity qualities can be followed up through e.g. course evaluations and examinations. Special focus should lie on how relevant the collaboration components are to the students.
Course or programme collaboration can be clarified and followed up through systematic documentation of the external collaboration activities, for example in a digital skills portfolio.
It is in SLU’s interest that our external partners are satisfied and wish to continue collaborating with us. Therefore, follow-up of the joint objectives for external collaboration must be carried out, or supported, by SLU, even if it partly lies outside the university’s assignment.
16.1 Starting points
16.2 Undergraduate procedures
“Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs[1].”
Sustainable development is built on three dimensions: the social, environmental and financial. The UN’s Sustainable Development Goals[2] include all three dimensions.
SLU must make visible the university operations that contribute to promoting sustainable use of natural resources. Environmental content in courses and programmes must be clear to SLU’s current and future students.
Relevant sustainable development dimensions must be integrated in our education. Early on in their study period, first-cycle and second-cycle students must be introduced to the connection between the course/programme content and sustainable development.
“In the course of their operations, higher education institutions shall promote sustainable development to assure for present and future generations a sound and healthy environment, economic and social welfare, and justice[3].”
SLU has general environmental objectives relating to energy usage, business travel, purchasing, environmental monitoring and assessment as well as sustainable development education[4].
General education for sustainable development objectives: All students who take part in an SLU programme must be given a good foundation to consider all sustainable development perspectives (financial, social, and environmental) in their future profession. This is achieved by meeting a few sub-objectives.
Educational format – see chapter 6. Course syllabus and course instance as well as chapter 12. Programme syllabus and programme instance.
Educational implementation – see section 16.2 Undergraduate procedures, chapter 7. Before and when a course starts as well as 8. Examinations (tests) and compulsory steps.
Department courses contain varying degrees of sustainable development. When relevant, the departments must work to promote and strengthen the course components that include sustainable development and sustainable usage of natural resources. In order to achieve this, each course must be reviewed, and possible opportunities to strengthen relevant environmental components must be investigated. Courses must be continuously evaluated in relation to knowledge transfer within the framework of sustainable development.
The following items need to be taken into consideration at course level:
Sustainable development education measures are followed up in the environmental management system that SLU uses.
The environmental coordinator and department directors of studies (or equivalent) normally have important roles in first- and second-cycle sustainable development education. The course coordinator has an important role at course level. The head of department is generally responsible for department activities.
It is preferable to use student representatives in local coordination and environmental management groups (equivalent).
The work at course level can be made easier by having the responsible department classify their courses into three groups:
When relevant and possible, special attention must be given to strengthen the sustainable development aspect and content in group 2) course with sustainable development components.
Annex 2: Annual cycle for course and programme planning
Annex 5: Joint course evaluation questions (Evald)
Annex 6: Joint course evaluation questions (Evald) for independent projects (degree projects)
Annex 8: Depublication process for pdf files already published in Epsilon
Annex 9: Changing a pdf file already published in Epsilon
Johan.Toren@slu.se, Division of Planning, +46 (0)18 672219
This pages is under construction. PDF-files of Education planning and administration handbook:
Chapter 1-2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
Chapter 7
Chapter 8
Chapter 9
Chapter 10
Chapter 11
Chapter 12
Chapter 13
Chapter 14
Chapter 15