Society and environment
The time frame for this course is decided in an overall programme plan, and may change from year to year. If you are not an attendee of this programme, but still want to take the course, please contact the course leader for up to date information.
Information from the course leader
Dear all, pls find fresch information on the CANVAS page for the course- you have all been invited and should be able to see the timetable and literature list there.
If you cannot open the CANVAS page for the course pls send me an e-mail: karin.gerhardt@slu.se
Kind regards,
Karin Gerhardt
Course evaluation
The course evaluation is now closed
MX0155-20106 - Course evaluation report
Once the evaluation is closed, the course coordinator and student representative have 1 month to draft their comments. The comments will be published in the evaluation report.
Syllabus and other information
Syllabus
MX0155 Society and environment, 10.0 Credits
Samhälle och miljöSubjects
Environmental Science Environmental scienceEducation cycle
Master’s levelModules
Title | Credits | Code |
---|---|---|
Single module | 10.0 | 0101 |
Advanced study in the main field
Second cycle, in-depth level of the course cannot be classifiedMaster’s level (AXX)
Grading scale
The grade requirements within the course grading system are set out in specific criteria. These criteria must be available by the course start at the latest.
Language
EnglishPrior knowledge
A Bachelor’s degree of at least 180 credits.English language proficiency that corresponds to English studies at upper secondary (high school) level in Sweden ("English 6").
Objectives
Main Objective
After completing the course students should understand the dynamic interactions between society and nature, how institutions affect the conditions for sustainable development. The students should have developed knowledge in assessing social, economic and ecological sustainability using systems and resilience thinking frameworks.
Part Objectives
After the completed course, the students are expected to demonstrate knowledge and understanding so that they can:
describe different approaches for defining, describing and explaining sustainable development in society,
critically discuss and analyze sustainability, using different social, economic and ecological perspectives within an integrative systems framework in general and in specific cases.
The students should also display their acquired knowledge to:
discuss and select appropriate approaches for analysing sustainable development
demonstrate practical application of scientific methods for analysing and evaluating actions in society with respect to resilience and sustainable development.
The students should be able to critically evaluate and relate to:
existing theories and methods for analysis when examining issues related to sustainability
management of natural resources and land use in relation to socio-economic development and conflicts
international and national activities, business and corporate enterprises in relation to sustainable development, and individual ethics and responsibilities for sustainability
Content
The course focuses on advanced knowledge on how individuals, organizations and their governing institutions can change to achieve sustainability in a world of accelerated climate change, biodiversity loss and finite resources. This implies the identification of potentials and constraints for sustainable development in different societies from a social and social-ecological perspective. Basic principles for governance for resilience and sustainability are discussed, such as human rights, democracy, poverty and inequality, economic systems, land use and international policy frameworks and conventions for sustainable development.
Approaches for describing and understanding the organization of society for achieving sustainable development will be elaborated upon, and different institutional solutions for management of environmental resources under conditions of risk, vulnerability and uncertainty will be discussed. Perspectives from different social science disciplines and approaches to sustainable development at different temporal and spatial scales will be analyzed, and criteria for successful management of human and natural resources be identified.
Treated topics include:
• Complex systems, resilience assessments and sustainability
• Economics and sustainable development
• Political science, security and climate change in relation to sustainability
• International frameworks and conventions
• Governance, land use conflict, and sustainability
• The connections and interactions between climate change, biodiversity loss and Sustainable Development Goals.
• Case studies (based on literature study)
Grading form
The grade requirements within the course grading system are set out in specific criteria. These criteria must be available by the course start at the latest.Formats and requirements for examination
Written home exam, presentation of project work, discussions and seminar participation/presentations (as above).
Passed home examination, approved project work and seminar presentations.
Active participation in seminars and participation in compulsory parts, which are discussions.
- If a student has failed an examination, the examiner has the right to issue supplementary assignments. This applies if it is possible and there are grounds to do so.
- The examiner can provide an adapted assessment to students entitled to study support for students with disabilities following a decision by the university. Examiners may also issue an adapted examination or provide an alternative way for the students to take the exam.
- If this syllabus is withdrawn, SLU may introduce transitional provisions for examining students admitted based on this syllabus and who have not yet passed the course.
- For the examination of a degree project (independent project), the examiner may also allow the student to add supplemental information after the deadline for submission. Read more in the Education Planning and Administration Handbook.
Other information
The right to participate in teaching and/or supervision only applies for the course instance the student was admitted to and registered on.
If there are special reasons, students are entitled to participate in components with compulsory attendance when the course is given again. Read more in the Education Planning and Administration Handbook.
Responsible department
Department of Ecology
Cooperating departments:
Grading criteria
Grading criteria for S&E 2021
Mark |
Home Exam |
Project (case study) |
Performance in group projects |
5 |
Write a reasoned argument that supports the application of a particular solution over alternative solutions Demonstrate an ability to synthesise concepts and excellent ability to discuss them in specific cases as well as general contexts in relation to sustainable development |
Critically assess and synthesise knowledge relevant to the specific case and draw conclusions in relation to current general knowledge and theories in sustainable development. Evaluate the scenarios in the case, including their use of argument to select the scenario that is most likely to provide a good sustainability outcome.
|
|
4 |
Demonstrates an ability to apply concepts and a good ability to analyse a sustainability problem and discuss them in specific cases, and in relation to general contexts of economic, social and ecological perspectives and solutions |
Show good ability to synthesise and draw conclusions from current knowledge relevant to the specific case and general discourse in sustainable development. Evaluate scenarios, methods used and discuss different solutions for transformation, related to the specific case.
|
Demonstrate significant participation in the assembly and articulation of the case report. |
3 |
Apply knowledge of sustainable development concepts learned during the course and discuss them in relation to a specific sustainability problem. |
Demonstrate appropriate selection and application of systems methods and tools for analysing a sustainable development case, identify the issues and articulate potential responses that addresses the issue. Critically evaluate international and national actors, (policies and organisations) business enterprises and their responsibilities for sustainability and transformation. |
Contribute to the design and implementation of the case study |
Weights of the different criteria:
1. Mark 3 is needed for all criteria to pass the course.
2. Mark 4 needs at least 4 for all criteria.
Mark 4 requires good knowledge of both theory and its applications.
3. Mark 5 needs 5 for all criteria except one (usually not lower than 4).
Mark 5 requires excellency in both theoretical knowledge and its use and applications.
Litterature list
- 9 Nemec [9 Nemec] (https://slunik.slu.se/kursfiler/MX0127/20050.1920/9_Nemec_et_al_Assessing-Resilience-in-Stressed-Watersheds.pdf)1) 10 Walker et al 2009 [10 Walker et al 2009] (https://slunik.slu.se/kursfiler/MX0127/20050.1920/10_Walker_et_al_ES-2008-2824.pdf)1) 11 Wayfinder [11 Wayfinder] (https://wayfinder.earth)1) 12 Sharpe et al [12 Sharpe et al] (https://slunik.slu.se/kursfiler/MX0127/20050.1920/12_Sharpe_ES-2016-8388.pdf)1) 13 Abel [13 Abel ] (https://slunik.slu.se/kursfiler/MX0127/20050.1920/13_Abel_ES-2016-8422.pdf)1) 14 Petersen et al scenario planning [14 Petersen et al scenario planning] (https://slunik.slu.se/kursfiler/MX0127/20050.1920/14_Peterson_2003_Scenario_Planning_a_Tool_for_Conservatio-2.pdf)1) 15 Biggs 2010 Teaching scenario planning [15 Biggs 2010 Teaching scenario planning] (https://slunik.slu.se/kursfiler/MX0127/20050.1920/15_Biggs_et_al_2010_Teaching-Scenario-planning.pdf)1) 16 Armitage [16 Armitage] (https://slunik.slu.se/kursfiler/MX0127/20050.1920/16_Armitage_et_al_2009_Adaptive-CoMgmt-Complexity.pdf)1) 17 DeCaro et al [17 DeCaro et al] (https://slunik.slu.se/kursfiler/MX0127/20050.1920/17_DeCaro_et_al_ES-2016-9036.pdf)1) 18 Naylor [18 Naylor] (https://slunik.slu.se/kursfiler/MX0127/20050.1920/18_Naylor_et_al_Science_2005.pdf)1) 1 Meadows [1 Meadows] (https://slunik.slu.se/kursfiler/MX0127/20050.1920/1_Meadows_D_Systems_book.pdf)1) 19 Hoekstra & Weidmann [19 Hoekstra & Weidmann] (https://slunik.slu.se/kursfiler/MX0127/20050.1920/19_Hoekstra-Wiedmann-2014-EnvironmentalFootprint_1.pdf)1) 2 Ch 1 Walker & Salt [2 Ch 1 Walker & Salt] (https://slunik.slu.se/kursfiler/MX0127/20050.1920/2_Walker_o_Salt_Resilience_thinking_Ch_1_(not_whole_book).pdf)1) 3 Holling 2001 [3 Holling 2001] (https://slunik.slu.se/kursfiler/MX0127/20050.1920/3_Holling_Understanding_Complexity.pdf)1) 4 Fath [4 Fath] (https://slunik.slu.se/kursfiler/MX0127/20050.1920/4_Fath_ES-2015-7467.pdf)1) 5 Berkes & Ross [5 Berkes & Ross] (https://slunik.slu.se/kursfiler/MX0127/20050.1920/5_Berket_o_Rss_2016_ERAUQ386526-2.pdf)1) 13. Blythe et al [13. Blythe et al] (https://slunik.slu.se/kursfiler/MX0127/20050.1920/6_Blythe_et_al-2018-Antipode.pdf)1) 7 Brand & Wissen [7 Brand & Wissen] (https://slunik.slu.se/kursfiler/MX0127/20050.1920/7_Brand_o_Wissen_2018.pdf)1) 8 Biggs 2012 [8 Biggs 2012] (https://slunik.slu.se/kursfiler/MX0127/20050.1920/8_Biggs_Resilience_annurev-environ-051211-123836.pdf)