New search
HU0004

Interdisciplinary Practice

Sustainable Development affects all conceivable aspects of our civilisation. But working with sustainability requires communication and co-operation between many scientific disciplines, between society’s practices and between companies’ production skills. Interdisciplinary methods are at the core of the toolbox needed for the next centuries for natural scientists, social scientists, practitioners and students. In this course we explore interdisciplinarity in two major fields of study. One is the biogeochemical cycles of the planet where different methods in natural science are used: biologists, chemists, oceanographers, meteorologists, physicists and geologists are all involved. The other field relates to the planning of sustainable city-hinterland systems, which combines a large numbers of natural and social scientific disciplines working with engineers, geographers, biologists, sociologists, historians, economists, planners, architects and landscape architects.

Information from the course leader

Literature Interdisciplinary Practice Course 2025

(Subject to changes)

    • Research methods for environmental studies: A social science approach, by Mark Kanazawa (Routledge, 2017):
    • Interdisciplinarity: A Critical Assessment. Jacobs, JA. and S. Frickel 2009. Annual Review of Sociology 35(1): 43-65.
    • Logics of interdisciplinarity. Economy and Society 37(1): 20-49. Barry, A., G. Born, et al. (2008).
    • Integrating the social and natural sciences in environmental research: a discussion paper. Strang, V. 2009. Environment, Development and Sustainability 11(1): 1-18
    • Practicing interdisciplinarity. Lélé, Sharachchandra, and Richard B. Norgaard. BioScience 55, no. 11 (2005): 967-975.
    • Harding, S. (2013). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity”? In Feminist Epistemologies (pp. 49-82). Routledge.
    • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
    • Gould, S. J. (1993). American polygeny and craniometry before Darwin. The “Racial” Economy of Science, 84-115.
    • Silverman, David, 2015. Interpreting Qualitative Data, 5th edition, chapter 7:'Interviews'. Available here.
    • Bryman, Allan, 2015. Social Research Methods, 5th edition, chapter 20: 'Interviewing in qualitative research'.
    • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597.
    • Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke's approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Quant 56, 1391–1412
    • David Snow, Case studies and social movements, in: The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of social and political movements.
    • Vandergeest et al 2015 Assembling sustainable territories space subjects.pdf Download Vandergeest et al 2015 Assembling sustainable territories space subjects
    • Nightingale 2016, Adaptive scholarship and situated knowledges Hybrid methodologies and plural epistemologies in climate change adaptation research
    • Cuadra, M. and Björklund, J. 2007. Assessment of economic and ecological carrying capacity of agricultural crops in Nicaragua. Ecological Indicators, 7 (2007) 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.11.003.
    • Cuadra, M. and Rydberg, T. 2006. Emergy evaluation on the production, processing and export of coffee in Nicaragua. Ecological Modelling, 196 (2006) 421-433
    • Cuadra, M. 2005. Assessment of the natural resource base of Nicaragua and case studies of its use in agricultural production and export. Doctoral Thesis No. 2005: 25. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Uppsala. 51 pp.
    • Mugejo, Ncube, Mutsvangwa, 2022, Infrastructure Performance and Irrigation Water Governance in Genadendal, Western Cape, South Africa Download Mugejo, Ncube, Mutsvangwa, 2022, Infrastructure Performance and Irrigation Water Governance in Genadendal, Western Cape, South Africa
    • Thow, Greenberg, Hara, et al,, 2018, Improving policy coherence for food security and nutrition in South Africa. A qualitative policy analysis
    • James Meadowcroft, and Daniel J. Fiorino. Conceptual Innovation in Environmental Policy. The MIT Press, 2017.)
    • Grey, S., & Patel, R. (2015). Food Sovereignty as Decolonization: Some contributions from Indigenous movements to food system and development politics. Agriculture and Human Values, 32, 431-444.
    • Tom, M. N., Sumida Huaman, E., & McCarty, T. L. (2019). Indigenous knowledges as vital contributions to sustainability. International Review of Education, 65, 1-18. Rarai, A., Parsons, M., Nursey-Bray, M., & Crease, R. (2022). Situating climate change adaptation within plural worlds: The role of Indigenous and local knowledge in Pentecost Island, Vanuatu. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 5(4), 2240-2282.
    • Gergan, M. D., & Curley, A. (2023). Indigenous youth and decolonial futures: Energy and environmentalism among the Diné in the Navajo Nation and the Lepchas of Sikkim, India. Antipode, 55(3), 749-769..
    • 5) Hughes, S. S., Velednitsky, S., & Green, A. A. (2023). Greenwashing in Palestine/Israel: Settler colonialism and environmental injustice in the age of climate catastrophe. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 6(1), 495-513.
    • Alfred, T., & Corntassel, J. (2005). Being Indigenous: Resurgences against contemporary colonialism. Government and opposition, 40(4), 597-614.
    • Smith, A. (2012). 4. Indigeneity, Settler Colonialism, White Supremacy. In D. HoSang, O. LaBennett & L. Pulido (Ed.), Racial Formation in the Twenty-First Century (pp. 66-90). Berkeley: University of California Press.
    • Hope, J. (2022). Globalising sustainable development: Decolonial disruptions and environmental justice in Bolivia. Area, 54(2), 176-184.
    • Thompson, K. L., & Ban, N. C. (2022). “Turning to the territory”: A Gitga'at Nation case study of Indigenous climate imaginaries and actions. Geoforum, 137, 230-236.
    • Mbah, M. F., Bailey, M., & Shingruf, A. (2023). Considerations for relational research methods for use in Indigenous contexts: implications for sustainable development. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2023.2185345
    • Simpson, L. B. (2017). As we have always done: Indigenous freedom through radical resistance. University of Minnesota Press.
    • Smith, L. T. (2021). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Course evaluation

The course evaluation is not yet activated

The course evaluation is open between 2025-06-01 and 2025-06-22

Additional course evaluations for HU0004

Academic year 2023/2024

Interdisciplinary Practice (HU0004-40157)

2024-03-20 - 2024-06-02

Academic year 2022/2023

Interdisciplinary Practice (HU0004-40123)

2023-03-22 - 2023-06-04

Syllabus and other information

Course facts

The course is offered as an independent course: No The course is offered as a programme course: Master's Programme in Sustainable Development The Master's Programme Sustainable Food Systems Tuition fee: Tuition fee only for non-EU/EEA/Switzerland citizens: 27500 SEK Cycle: Master’s level (A1N)
Subject: Sustainable Development
Course code: HU0004 Application code: SLU-40098 Location: Uppsala Distance course: No Language: English Responsible department: Department of Urban and Rural Development Pace: 100%