Independent project in Food Science, Food Inspection - Master's Programme, A1E
Syllabus and other information
Syllabus
EX1055 Independent project in Food Science, Food Inspection - Master's Programme, A1E, 15.0 Credits
Självständigt arbete i livsmedelsvetenskap - magisterprogrammet i livsmedelstillsyn, A1ESubjects
Food ScienceEducation cycle
Master’s levelAdvanced study in the main field
Second cycle, contains degree project for Master of Arts/Master of Science (60 credits)Master’s level (A1E)
Grading scale
The grade requirements within the course grading system are set out in specific criteria. These criteria must be available by the course start at the latest.
Language
SwedishPrior knowledge
Knowledge corresponding to 15 credits at second-cycle level in the main field of study. A Pass grade for the independent project at first-cycle level, or a Bachelor´s degree. The student must have completed at one course relevant to the subject of the independent project before starting the project. English skills equivalent to English 6.Objectives
The aim of the course is for the student, based on previously acquired knowledge, to independently plan, carry out and present an academic study within a given time frame. Through the independent project, the student will develop their skills in the academic work process and deepen their subject knowledge.
Upon successful completion of the course, students will be able to
• independently identify and formulate scientific questions;
• independently search, compile, evaluate and critically interpret relevant information and literature;
• plan and, using adequate methods, carry out a study within given time frames;
• analyse and evaluate data and/or findings on a scientific basis;
• discuss contents and conclusions in a scientific work critically, and reflect on how the choice of question and method relates to the scientific and practical basis of the subject;
• reflect on social and ethical aspects, sustainability aspects within the subject as well as ethical aspects of research and development;
• present a scientific work in accordance with the prevailing practice of the discipline, adapted to the intended audience and according to the instructions given;
• write a summary in English of a scientific report according to the instructions given;
• write a popular science summary of a scientific work according to the instructions given;
• present a scientific work orally and critically review and discuss, as well as give constructive criticism of, another student’s project, including method, conclusions and the context of the work in a wider perspective;
• identify their own skill and knowledge development needs in the subject of the project.
Content
The course involves carrying out an independent academic project under supervision. The project can be carried out based on existing data from experimental or practical work, or as a literature review. The format depends on the subject and the question to be examined, as well as on the availability of suitable data and information. The work is preferably carried out individually but work in pairs is possible.
The set-up of the independent project should be documented in a project plan established in consultation with the supervisor before the project starts.
The project is to be presented in writing as well as orally, as seminars or an equivalent format, and according to the instructions given. The course also involves taking part in a public discussion of another student’s project in order to assess the ability to give constructive criticism.
Grading form
The grade requirements within the course grading system are set out in specific criteria. These criteria must be available by the course start at the latest.Formats and requirements for examination
A Pass grade for the written report and the oral presentation, as well as a Pass grade for the critical review of another student’s project. If the work has been carried out in pairs, it must be made clear to the examiner what each individual has contributed; this applies to both the written work and the oral presentation. The work effort and the scope of the work should correspond to 15 credits for each student, and each student must fulfil all intended learning outcomes. If the student has not received a Pass grade for a test, the examiner has the right to give a supplementary assignment, provided this is feasible and can be justified.
If a student has failed an examination, the examiner has the right to issue supplementary assignments. This applies if it is possible and there are grounds to do so.
The examiner can provide an adapted assessment to students entitled to study support for students with disabilities following a decision by the university. Examiners may also issue an adapted examination or provide an alternative way for the students to take the exam.
If this syllabus is withdrawn, SLU may introduce transitional provisions for examining students admitted based on this syllabus and who have not yet passed the course.
For the assessment of an independent project (degree project), the examiner may also allow a student to add supplemental information after the deadline for submission. Read more in the Education Planning and Administration Handbook.
Other information
The right to participate in teaching and/or supervision only applies for the course instance the student was admitted to and registered on.
If there are special reasons, students are entitled to participate in components with compulsory attendance when the course is given again. Read more in the Education Planning and Administration Handbook.
Additional information
Once the student has received a Pass grade for the written report, this must be published in the SLU system for electronic publication (Epsilon) and checked for plagiarism. To be admitted to the course, the student must have an agreement with the supervising department concerning supervisor and the subject of the project.Responsible department
Department of Energy and Technology