Environmental impact assessment and environmental communication – introduction
Course evaluation
The course evaluation is now closed
MX0136-20068 - Course evaluation report
Once the evaluation is closed, the course coordinator and student representative have 1 month to draft their comments. The comments will be published in the evaluation report.
Additional course evaluations for MX0136
Academic year 2023/2024
Environmental impact assessment and environmental communication – introduction (MX0136-20176)
2023-10-31 - 2023-11-30
Academic year 2021/2022
Environmental impact assessment and environmental communication – introduction (MX0136-20133)
2021-11-02 - 2021-12-02
Academic year 2020/2021
Environmental impact assessment and environmental communication – introduction (MX0136-20134)
2020-11-02 - 2020-12-02
Academic year 2019/2020
Environmental impact assessment and environmental communication – introduction (MX0136-20070)
2019-11-01 - 2019-12-03
Academic year 2018/2019
Environmental impact assessment and environmental communication – introduction (MX0136-20112)
2018-11-05 - 2018-12-09
Syllabus and other information
Syllabus
MX0136 Environmental impact assessment and environmental communication – introduction, 7.5 Credits
Miljökonsekvensbeskrivning och miljökommunikation – introduktionSubjects
Environmental Science Environmental scienceEducation cycle
Bachelor’s levelModules
| Title | Credits | Code |
|---|---|---|
| Single module | 7.5 | 0201 |
Advanced study in the main field
First cycle, has only upper-secondary level entry requirementsBachelor’s level (G1N)
Grading scale
The grade requirements within the course grading system are set out in specific criteria. These criteria must be available by the course start at the latest.
Language
SwedishPrior knowledge
General entry requirements for higher education.Objectives
Content
Grading form
The grade requirements within the course grading system are set out in specific criteria. These criteria must be available by the course start at the latest.Formats and requirements for examination
If a student has failed an examination, the examiner has the right to issue supplementary assignments. This applies if it is possible and there are grounds to do so.
The examiner can provide an adapted assessment to students entitled to study support for students with disabilities following a decision by the university. Examiners may also issue an adapted examination or provide an alternative way for the students to take the exam.
If this syllabus is withdrawn, SLU may introduce transitional provisions for examining students admitted based on this syllabus and who have not yet passed the course.
For the assessment of an independent project (degree project), the examiner may also allow a student to add supplemental information after the deadline for submission. Read more in the Education Planning and Administration Handbook.
Other information
The right to participate in teaching and/or supervision only applies for the course instance the student was admitted to and registered on.
If there are special reasons, students are entitled to participate in components with compulsory attendance when the course is given again. Read more in the Education Planning and Administration Handbook.
Responsible department
Department of Urban and Rural Development
Further information
Litterature list
Huvudbok för miljökommunikation
Hallgren, L. & Ljung, M. (2005) Miljökommunikation, aktörssamverkan och processledning. Studentlitteratur.
Huvudbok för miljöbedömning
Ryegård, A. & Åkerskog, A. (2020) Miljöbedömningar i miljöbalken. Studentlitteratur.
Boken är vald för att studenter tidigare år önskat kurslitteratur på svenska. Vi kommer även att komplettera med boken Glasson, J. & Therivel R. (2019) Introduction to environmental impact assessment. Routledge, som finns att tillgänglig att låna och läsa online via SLU-biblioteket.
Övrig kurslitteratur miljöbedömning (finns som länkar)
Tema 1
Naturvårdsverkets vägledning: Syftet med miljöbedömningar https://www.naturvardsverket.se/vagledning-och-stod/miljobalken/specifik-miljobedomning/#E-1999451328
Hörnberg Lindgren,. C (2005) Miljökonsekvensbedömningar som rättsligt verktyg för hållbar utveckling. Delarna: 1.2.2 miljökonsekvensbeskrivningens kännetecken sid. 24-30, 3.4 Kriterierna som identifiering sid 58-60 (valbart att även läsa del III för fördjupning av kriterierna samt 18 Miljökonsekvensbeskrivning som rättsligt verktyg för hållbar utveckling sid 249-265). https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:143665/FULLTEXT01.pdf
What is impact assessment?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6F-gNyjayA&feature=emb_logo International Association for Impact Assessment (ca 3,5 min videoklipp)
Tema 2
Naturvårdsverkets vägledning.
- Specifik miljöbedömning. Alternativ, nollalternativ (orientera dig i materialet). https://www.naturvardsverket.se/vagledning-och-stod/miljobalken/specifik-miljobedomning/alternativ/
- Strategisk miljöbedömning. Alternativ, nollalternativ (orientera dig i materialet) https://www.naturvardsverket.se/vagledning-och-stod/miljobalken/strategisk-miljobedomning/alternativ/
Boverkets vägledning. Strategisk miljöbedömning översiktsplan. Alternativ, nollalternativ. (orientera dig i materialet) https://www.boverket.se/sv/PBL-kunskapsbanken/planering/oversiktsplan/oversiktsplanen/miljokonsekvensbeskrivn/
Steinemann, A. (2001) Improving alternatives for environmental impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 21, 3-21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925500000755
Tema 3
Naturvårdsverkets vägledning. Miljöeffekter och miljöaspekter (orientera dig i materialet) https://www.naturvardsverket.se/vagledning-och-stod/miljobalken/specifik-miljobedomning/miljoeffekter/
Europakommissionens vägledning kring avgränsning. Läs främst 4.1.1 Step 4a – Identifying significant effects, s 40-45. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/pdf/EIA_guidance_Scoping_final.pdf
Klocker Larsen, R. et al (2020) Omtvistade landskap - Navigering mellan konkurrerande markanvändning och kumulativa effekter https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1454030/FULLTEXT01.pdf Läs Första vinjetten: Exploatörer tar otillräcklig hänsyn till kumulativa effekter på samebyar sid 18-22.
Tema 4
Kågström, M (2016) Between ‘best’ and ‘good enough’: how consultants guide quality in environmental assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 60, 169–175 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925515300871
Klocker Larsen, R. et al (2020) Omtvistade landskap - Navigering mellan konkurrerande markanvändning och kumulativa effekter https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1454030/FULLTEXT01.pdf Läs Andra vinjetten: Sverige sämst avseende urfolks inflytande vid miljöbedömningar. Sid 23-26.
MKBdagen 2020 – panel om aktörers färdigheter och förmågor.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sA-W4P-FIkM&list=PLgGFtRVUTORSCbRPSxpTyNnyt_uMwfJR4&index=8 (Videoklipp, se fram till 35.15)