Foodscapes 2
Foodscapes 2 continues to build on food culture and landscape as perspectives for understanding and analysing the role of food in sustainable development. This course departures from major global agendas, such as: UN SDG´s, UN Food Summit and Planetary Boundaries.
The course will be structured in different theme weeks. These weeks will derive from different challenges presented in these agendas. The understanding and analyses will be deepened by addition of perspectives from Critical Food Studies. The selected challenges will be connected to physical landscapes and places through case studies.
The course will be taught through literature seminars, lectures and field studies. Assessments will be carried out through assignments (individually and in groups) throughout the course, with a written final assignment based on literature studies and discussions during the various themed weeks.
How well the student succeeds in achieving the course objectives depends on the ability to present and relate to the key concepts to problems or topics addressed in the course. This means that it is central to learn to think about food concepts as a tool for critical analysis and creative work, rather than as facts to be learned and memorized.
Literature seminars, field studies and essay seminars are mandatory.
Course evaluation
Additional course evaluations for FS0008
Academic year 2024/2025
2024-09-02 - 2024-10-31
Syllabus and other information
Syllabus
FS0008 Foodscapes 2, 15.0 Credits
Foodscapes 2Subjects
Landscape Architecture Food StudiesEducation cycle
Master’s levelModules
Title | Credits | Code |
---|---|---|
Literature seminar | 5.0 | 0101 |
Excursions | 5.0 | 0102 |
Individual written assignment | 5.0 | 0103 |
Advanced study in the main field
Second cycle, has second-cycle course/s as entry requirementsMaster’s level (A1F)
Grading scale
The grade requirements within the course grading system are set out in specific criteria. These criteria must be available by the course start at the latest.
Language
EnglishPrior knowledge
Knowledge equivalent to 150 credits, of which 90 credits within one of the following areas:\- natural sciences
\- social sciences
\- humanities
\- technology
\- food and meal science.
and minimum 15 credits in Food Studies on advanced level
and
English 6 or equivalent.
Objectives
The aim of the course is to develop and widen the understanding of relationships between food, landscapes, places and people on a global level, using the lenses of Food culture and landscape, to be applied in solutions for sustainable development. This involves perspectives from Critical Food Studies. Progression from earlier courses increases through further problematisation of the relationship between food and the physical environment in urban and rural situations. The content is inspired by agendas on different levels related to food and environment, such as the seven priorities addressed by UN Food summit. The course also addresses key issues such as how food signals particular identities; and the roles of food in global flows, including globalisation, colonisation, immigration and tourism. The course also takes up food in terms of production and consumption, assessing the politics, economics, and geographies of food. It also examines food policies and patterns of industry: food safety, security, and justice. Animal ethics, Rural and Urban Food deserts, Food and gender, Food inequalities and Food empowerment are also among the concepts dealt with on the course.
After completion of the course, the student should be able to:
• show, define and analyze the connections between food, places/landscapes and people in various scales
• evaluate and criticize food related plans, policy’s, scientific articles and projects from both the perspective of landscape and critical food studies
• identify, describe and discuss different food and landscape connected aspects and perspectives within a project
• apply theories and concepts in order to analyze and discuss global challenges from both a landscape and food cultural perspectives.
Content
Foodscapes 2 continues to build on food culture and landscape as perspectives for understanding and analysing the role of food in sustainable development. This course departures from major global agendas, such as: UN SDG´s, UN Food Summit and Planetary Boundaries.
The course will be structured in different theme weeks. These weeks will derive from different challenges presented in these agendas. The understanding and analyses will be deepened by addition of perspectives from Critical Food Studies. The selected challenges will be connected to physical landscapes and places through case studies.
The course will be taught through literature seminars, lectures and field studies. Assessments will be carried out through assignments (individually and in groups) throughout the course, with a written final assignment based on literature studies and discussions during the various themed weeks.
How well the student succeeds in achieving the course objectives depends on the ability to present and relate to the key concepts to problems or topics addressed in the course. This means that it is central to learn to think about food concepts as a tool for critical analysis and creative work, rather than as facts to be learned and memorized.
Literature seminars, field studies and essay seminars are mandatory.
The course focuses on the following generic competencies: critical thinking, scientific methods, written and oral communication and independence.
Collaboration with the surrounding community takes place through gest lectures and study visits.
Grading form
The grade requirements within the course grading system are set out in specific criteria. These criteria must be available by the course start at the latest.Formats and requirements for examination
Active participation in compulsory elements and approved assignments.
If a student has failed an examination, the examiner has the right to issue supplementary assignments. This applies if it is possible and there are grounds to do so.
The examiner can provide an adapted assessment to students entitled to study support for students with disabilities following a decision by the university. Examiners may also issue an adapted examination or provide an alternative way for the students to take the exam.
If this syllabus is withdrawn, SLU may introduce transitional provisions for examining students admitted based on this syllabus and who have not yet passed the course.
For the assessment of an independent project (degree project), the examiner may also allow a student to add supplemental information after the deadline for submission. Read more in the Education Planning and Administration Handbook.
Other information
The right to participate in teaching and/or supervision only applies for the course instance the student was admitted to and registered on.
If there are special reasons, students are entitled to participate in components with compulsory attendance when the course is given again. Read more in the Education Planning and Administration Handbook.
Responsible department
Department of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management
Further information
Litterature list
Readings Foodscape 2 FS0008
All course literature will be available online
Research articles;
Bellina, L. 2016. Feeding cities sustainably: the contribution of a ‘zerofoodwaste-city’ to sustainable development goal 2, ‘zero hunger’. In Food futures: ethics, science and culture. Conference Proceedings, Wageningen Academic Publishers Pages: pp. 113 - 118 [https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-834-6\_16](
Kaiser, M. 2021, What is wrong with the EAT Lancet report? In Justice and food security in a changing climate, Editors Hanna Schübel and Ivo Wallimann-Helmer. Pages: 374 – 380, [https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-915-2\_58](
Mackenzie, John S, and Martyn Jeggo. 2019. "The One Health Approach—Why Is It So Important?" Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 4, no. 2: 88. [https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed4020088](
Mercado, G a,⇑, Carsten Nico Hjortsø. Explaining the development policy implementation gap: A case of a failed food sovereignty policy in Bolivia
Mercado, G., Hjortsø, C.N. & Honig, B. Decoupling from international food safety standards: how small-scale indigenous farmers cope with conflicting institutions to ensure market participation. Agric Hum Values 35, 651–669 (2018). [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-018-9860-x](
Marcello Magoni & Angela Colucci (2017) Protection of Peri-Urban Open Spaces and Food-System Strategies. The Case of Parco delle Risaie in Milan, Planning Practice & Research, 32:1, 40-54, DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2015.1028251
Marte, Lidia,(2007) Foodmaps: Tracing Boundaries of ‘Home’ Through Food Relations. https://doi.org/10.1080/07409710701620243
Lewis, D. 2015. Gender, feminism and food studies. African Security Review, 24(4): 414-429. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2015.1090115](
O’Donoghue, T.; Minasny, B.; McBratney, A. 2022. Regenerative Agriculture and Its Potential to Improve Farmscape Function. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5815. Academic Editors: Lucia Rocchi and Luisa Paolotti [https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105815](
Steffen, W., K. Richardson, J. Rockström, S.E. Cornell, I. Fetzer, E.M. Bennett, R. Biggs, S.R. Carpenter, W. De Vries, C.A. De Wit, C. Folke, D. Gerten, J. Heinke, G.M. Mace, L.M. Persson, V. Ramanathan, B. Reyers, S. Sörlin. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347: 736. SCIENCE Vol 347, Issue 6223 [https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1259855](
Joe Smith, Petr Jehlička. Quiet sustainability: Fertile lessons from Europe's productive gardeners.(2013) [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.05.002](
Stetkiewicz S., Norman R.A., Allison E. H., Andrew N. L., Ara G., Banner-Stevens G., Belton B., Beveridge M., Bogard J.. R., Bush S. R., Coffee P., Crumlish M., Edwards P., Eltholth M., Falconer L., Ferreira J. G., Garrett A., Gatward I., Islam .F. U., Kaminski A. M., Kjellevold ., Kruijssen F, Leschen W., Mamun A. McAdam B., Newton R., Krogh-Poulsen B., Pounds ., Richardson.B, Roos N., Röös E., Schapper .A, Spence-McConnell T., Suri Sharon K., Thilsted S. H., Thompson K.D., Tlusty .M F., Troell M.F, Vignola R., Young J. A., Zhang ., Little D.C. 2022. Seafood in Food Security: A Call for Bridging the Terrestrial-Aquatic Divide. (2022). In Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, Vol. 5. [https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2021.703152](
Chiara Tornaghi, 2014, Critical geography of urban agriculture, Progress in Human Geography, Volume: 38 issue: 4, page(s): 551-567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513512542
**Book chapters; in Routledge Handbook of Urban Food Governance**
1. Towards Urban Food Governance for More Sustainable and Just FuturesByAna Moragues-Faus, Jill K. Clark, Jane Battersby, Anna Davies
25. The City Region Food System Approach: Broadening the space for urban governance Alison Blay-Palmer, Jess Halliday, Guido Santini, Joy Carey, Roman Malec, Makiko Taguchi, Rene van Veenhuizen, and Laine Young
26. International Agendas and Urban Food System Governance: Informing, integrating and operationalizing the SDGs Thomas Forster, Florence Egal and Ana Puhac
32. Towards good food landscapes: The intrinsic links between continuous productive urban landscapes and food governance, Katrin Bohn and André Viljoen
**Book chapters; Routledge Handbook of Food as a Commons**
Vivero-Pol. J.L. 2020. The idea of food as a commons: multiple understandings for multiple dimensions of food. In Routledge Handbook of Food as a Commons. Edited by. Vivero-Pol, J.L. Ferrando, T., De Schutter,O., Mattei U. pp. 25-41.
Pettenati, G., Toldo, A., Ferrando, T. 2020. The food system as a commons. In Routledge Handbook of Food as a Commons. Edited by. Vivero-Pol, J.L. Ferrando, T., De Schutter,O., Mattei U. pp. 42-56.
**Book chapters; Routledge handbook of landscape and food**
Zeunert, J. 2018. Challenges in agricultural sustainability and resilience: towards regenerative practice. In Zeunert, J.; Waterman. T. (Eds.). Routledge handbook of landscape and food. Routledge: Oxon, UK.
Reports;
The EAT-Lancet Commission. 2019. Healthy Diets From Sustainable Food Systems. Food Planet Health.
Summary Report of the EAT-Lancet Commission. https://eatforum.org/eat-lancet-commission/eat-lancet-commission-summary-report/
(The entire The EAT-Lancet report can be found online at https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)31788-4/fulltext )